bburns632

Interesting @drkarthi. So disabling the hierarchical layout seems to yield a less dense but still hierarchical layout? What is the lowest node in your example above with hierarchical layout disabled?

Hi @kenahoo, Thanks for your resurfacing this discussion. I agree that the package in focus would look best atop the DAG structure. That way the graphic would read something like...

@patrick-boueri, yes, the main goals here were: 1. Extract the internal & external dependency networks of an R package. 2. Expose these networks via visualizations & network statistics. 3. Utilize...

This idea is being staged for the next release (v.0.5.0) temporarily. The goal and scope of v0.5.0 is being discussed in #208.

Hi @darshandoshi95, We are moving ahead with a v0.4.0 release without the feature. This idea is being staged for the next release (v.0.5.0) temporarily. However, the theme, goal and scope...

This package is being maintained but no significantly different revisions being planned on in the near future. Closing version planning docs.

This package is not under active development. We always welcome contributions, but there are no immediately plans for new features at the moment. Consequently, closing this item.

Now that CI is lower cost (in terms of time), I'd like to test what appetite there is to update the docs and publish to PyPy. I feel guilty we're...

Of course. This was posted as a general question / call to action for the pkgnet community. To that end, if anyone is interested in developing this feature, please comment...

OK. Looking into this feature. Would like to bounce this idea off you @jayqi as I recall much of the current function network code originally written by you. **Why do...