bbrk24
bbrk24
What's the status on this? I have a branch that fixes this at least temporarily, see the diff [here](https://github.com/zackradisic/aussieplusplus/compare/master...bbrk24:docs-update), but if it's supposed to be done automatically that's a deeper...
Silly suggestion: Since we're already using `` for braces, if/when a type system is implemented, use `{}` for generics
> like JavaScript objects [...]? Or do we want them to be classes? It's worth noting that JavaScript itself has both. Although, classes in JS are a special type of...
I just had an idea to emulate arrays as functions: ```aussie G'DAY MATE! // Takes in an "array" function, an index, and the new value for that index. // Returns...
Actually, I think I can get a PR out for this.
> How do we know where one boolean ends and the other begins? This issue does already exist, if you declare the variables `yeah` and `nah`, you can't have them...
My example from earlier now gives even more errors: ``` [line 7] OI MATE! expected ! but got = [line 7] OI MATE! expected ! but got 1 [line 7]...
Relatedly, this is legal: ```go G'DAY MATE! THE HARD YAKKA FOR func1 IS () < GIMME "func1 called"; > THE HARD YAKKA FOR func2 IS () < GIMME "func2 called";...
I'm not qualified to comment on the Australianism, but the syntax looks fine (and is reminiscent of older JS `function() {}`).
@jwfxpr I asked someone who is more qualified to speak to the Australianisms than I am, and he basically said that: `OLD MATE` is fine; `DEADSET` feels odd there, and...