Bert Blommers

Hi @yairsappir, moto >= 5.0.10.dev18 now returns the correct state for deregistered instances. > when calling describe_target_health on a target that doesn't exist using the regular boto3 api results in...

Thanks for the explanation @yairsappir! `moto >= 5.0.10.dev23` now also returns the `Target.NotRegistered` in that scenario, so as far as I can tell it behaves exactly like AWS. I've closes...

Hi @dmarra, thanks for raising this. My assumption is that the application takes whatever `OutputLocation` is given, downloads the result from S3 and does whatever it needs to do with...

Hi @dmarra, this is now part of `moto >= 5.0.12.dev3`. It uses the bucket provided by the user, and the file name is the execution ID, so it follows the...

Hi @tomlarkworthy, that's definitely helpful - we should be able to figure out what AWS exactly does here behind the scenes, it seems fairly straightforward. Thanks for raising this!

Hi @armichaud! I would actually create the secret, yes. It is a fairly cheap operation, and easy to support, so I so no reason not to.

Hi @rtandy! Thank you for raising this and for providing the examples of where we go wrong! I've raised a PR that fixes all these, and added tests that also...

Hi @MikiPWata! If I'm reading the documentation right, there are three scenario's where the StorageClass is set in AWS: 1. When creating an object 2. When copying an object (_and_...

> Hey @bblommers! Thanks for your comment! I think you are right, we just need to worry about the copy operation. I tried implementing getter and setter, but the following...

Ah, I understand @MikiPWata. The indentation of both the getter and setter is wrong, I guess that broke things in a weird way. If you indent both methods to make...