Henry Story

yes. so the idea is to be able to read the contents of the collection, and have write only access to document1, but not read access. If we allow some...

Thanks @TallTed for the clarification. I made the changes and added some extra examples.

> I would be fine with allowing access to .acls as long as you are able to set who has access to them. Ok so if wACLs can themselves have...

@justinwb wrote > I think @bblfish makes a good argument for cases where it might be beneficial to see an .acl without proof of control access first. Still, I do...

I think the problem is the following. If wACL documents have their own acl link relation how do you not end up with an infinite regress? Also how does this...

I think an append only resource make sense for notifications. Alice subscribes to a Container that lists events (using a yet to be defined method). The result of that subscription...

> As I understand use case above intends to involve a non container / collection resource to which people append. That was my understanding too. The container I mentioned above...

According to this blog post [Service Workers! Your first step towards Progressive Web Apps ](https://itnext.io/service-workers-your-first-step-towards-progressive-web-apps-pwa-e4e11d1a2e85) Service Workers are limited to fetch from the Origin they were loaded from. (This may...

Thanks for those details. I think during the teleconf we discussed quite a lot the problem of signing things with private keys made by remote apps. The problems were as...

This was discussed on Mon 7 Oct in the Authentication Panel, see [Panel notes](https://hackmd.io/wviX2msoSqCSN2kZTkUJ8Q)