Bozhidar Batsov
Bozhidar Batsov
@fatkodima Fine by me.
What about doing the same things with floats? The results will be similar, even if often they won't be totally accurate due to the way floats are implemented internally.
Okay, I guess we can merge this as is. Thanks for working on it!
I get allowing `!` for assignment and `=` for setters, but I don't get the other cases. Why would someone name methods in such a way - it doesn't make...
> In fact I think the title of this MR is slightly misleading, it is not about "allowing them as accessor names", but rather "stop considering them as accessor names"....
I'm also happy to extend improve our documentation and your suggestions about a FAQ and a quickref are fine by me. PRs welcome!
Let's mark this PR as WIP in the mean time.
@r7kamura can you rebase this on top of `master`, so we can finally merge it?
Oh, I had forgotten about this one.
I'm fine with the proposal, but I think this change in behavior should be mentioned somewhere in the docs as well, as I don't think it'd be obvious out-of-the-box that...