Support `{name}` and `{version}` placeholders in `use_repo`
This allows module extensions to reliably namespace repos created by individual modules, even in the presence of multiple_version_override, without causing additional churn for users during version bumps. In particular, projects with a publishing workflow that patches in the version attribute of the module function don't need to modify that workflow to e.g. patch a global constant or also search for the old version in use_repo call arguments.
Context: https://bazelbuild.slack.com/archives/C09E58X3AQ7/p1764934858912079
RELNOTES: The values of keyword arguments passed to use_repo can now contain the special substrings {name} and {version}, which are treated as equivalent to the corresponding attributes of the current module.
Summary of Changes
Hello @fmeum, I'm Gemini Code Assist[^1]! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request enhances Bazel's Bzlmod system by enabling the use of dynamic placeholders, specifically {name} and {version}, within use_repo calls. This allows module extensions to construct repository names that are context-aware of the module consuming them, leading to more flexible and maintainable module definitions. The implementation involves modifying the useRepo logic to perform string substitutions and updating the module's internal representation to expose version information, all backed by new, comprehensive tests.
Highlights
- Placeholder Support in use_repo: The
use_repofunction now supports{name}and{version}placeholders in its arguments, allowing for dynamic generation of repository names based on the module's identity. - Module Version Retrieval: A new
getVersion()abstract method has been added to theInterimModule.Builderinterface to facilitate retrieving the module's version for placeholder substitution. - Enhanced Testing: A new parameterized test has been introduced to thoroughly validate the correct replacement of
{name}and{version}placeholders inuse_repocalls, covering various version formats.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with :thumbsup: and :thumbsdown: on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
[^1]: Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.
@bazel-io fork 9.0.0