wanted: osqp-eigen

[kgreenek]

Module location

https://github.com/robotology/osqp-eigen

Link to bzlmod issue in the module's repository

No response

Any other context to provide?

No response

Fund our work

• [ ] Sponsor our community's open source work by donating a feature bounty

[traversaro]

I looked into this in https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel-central-registry/discussions/3353 but I am not a bazel expert, so if you have any suggestion feel free to weigh in!

[kgreenek]

I looked into this in #3353 but I am not a bazel expert, so if you have any suggestion feel free to weigh in!

Happy to contribute. Those linker errors are strange indeed.

I have a BUILD.bazel file that looks like this, which I have been using for quite some time:

cc_library(
    name = "osqp-eigen",
    srcs = glob(["src/*.cpp"]),
    hdrs = glob([
        "include/OsqpEigen/*.h",
        "include/OsqpEigen/*.hpp",
        "include/OsqpEigen/*.tpp",
    ]),
    defines = [
        # Uncomment this to enable debug printing for testing.
        #"OSQP_EIGEN_DEBUG_OUTPUT",
        "OSQP_EIGEN_OSQP_IS_V1",
    ],
    includes = ["include"],
    visibility = ["//visibility:public"],
    deps = [
        "@eigen",
        "@osqp",
    ],
)

It's worth saying that I am using the latest version on main for both osqp and osqp-eigen. I had issues which I can't remember now when using the latest osqp release (which is quite old now).

[kgreenek]

I just had a look at the osqp BUILD.bazel file in bcr, and it does look like some issues might need to be addressed there.

I'm happy to take a look, but I'd rather use the latest commit on main because they cleaned up a lot of stuff since the 0.6.3 release.

Unfortunately, they haven't release v1.0 yet.

What would be the protocol for me to release a version to BCR, which is just a commit hash from main? Is that allowed, or should I keep this internal to my own repo until they publish a formal release upstream?

[wep21]

Now, osqp 1.0 has been released. I'll try to add it into bcr, first.

[traversaro]

Thanks @wep21 ! If there is anything do you think it make sense to have in osqp-eigen upstream let us know, I would love to understand how to properly support bazel/bazel-central-registry in the C++ libraries we mantain.