Would be better if TreeNode<T>

[lvyandev]

Very nice lib! It would be better if treeNode has generic type to make it easier to access data's fields without cast.

[baumths]

Hey, thank you for trying the package out!

I have worked with that before but <T> was lost somewhere and I still had to cast it in the example.

Any suggestions on how to approach this without making every class accept generics?

[lvyandev]

Any suggestions on how to approach this without making every class accept generics?

For now I haven't figured out a solution, or It might be suggested to write generics everywhere according to linter:rules - always_specify_types

[baumths]

For now I haven't figured out a solution, or It might be suggested to write generics everywhere according to linter:rules - always_specify_types

It's also written in there that we should use Object if we need that variable to override == and hashcode.

With generics I can't guarantee that the variable won't be dynamic.

Edit: perhaps using <T extends Object> would solve that issue...

[lvyandev]

Sure, I didn't see that. Could give it a try