Darien Maillet Valentine

I like the one verb approach, but ‘obfuscate’ has a specific meaning which is not the same as what this directive does. To obfuscate something is not to hide or...

@ljharb I like those; they’re clear. I would have figured the preference for brevity would be strong among interested folks, but personally, if choosing between something brief but ??? and...

Those seem pretty reasonable to me too @hax, though I’d be slightly concerned by how easy it is to forget the order (`"hide source, stack"` vs `"hide stack, source"`). I’d...

I don’t know of any. The example in question specifically mentions it in the context of refactoring hazards, which does seem like a stretch even though it isn’t impossible. For...

> Including the source text doesn't tell you the source text location. The forbidden extension text in this proposal says “expose the existence _or_ source code location”. I figured “existence”...

Interesting, I _want_ that to be considered a bug, but I didn't think it was actually mandated by anything. I'll open a Chromium issue for that, but - do you...

I’ve found pragma directives significantly increased the fraction of loads where our CSP actually gets applied as authored, fwiw. Stripping or falsifying content-security-policy & x-frame-options headers has become a normal...

I agree with @miragecraft — this slope doesn’t seem very slippery? I understand that it seems to cry out for generalization, but the need for :focus-visible-within is pressing in a...

yes!! :has is real, sorta! nobody's shipped it on a main channel yet, but [Safari TP has it](https://developer.apple.com/safari/technology-preview/release-notes/#:~:text=collapse%20properties%20(r287429)-,%3Ahas(),-Added%20style%20invalidation) and Chromium work seems to be ongoing/active (there are related commits from...

At least with regard to some of the stated use cases, this appears to suffer from the [evil bit](https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3514.txt) problem.