Ruben Bartelink

I'm not suggesting it should be equally prominent in the builder DSL or a general options record - clearly a destructive thing like this should not share space in the...

@jiffypopjr Yes, _I_ could - the reason I'm asking here though is: a) there was once such a facility b) others demonstrably need it c) not having it makes the...

@ealsur @kadukf @mkolt right now, I'm looking at having to build something to delete the state which will need to stay in sync with the CFP impl. If I am...

@mkolt Yes, that sounds like it would fit

This stems from the fact that right now each completion results (except when in manual ack mode) in the writing of progress (see #128 for details). Changing to single delivery...

The `LeaseId` parameter is the equivalent (if you don't supply one, the consumer group is effectively `""`) _I'd personally love to see you do a PR to edit in some...

@CodeCheetah do you feel this still makes sense given #84 and #123 ?

It's ready to merge whenever so feel free to merge if you're doing a traverse and/or trying to trim down the list. The note/timeframe is more for me to circle...

Did you investigate what would be involved in blocking the addition of null converters in the first instance? (I'm thinking that there's probably similar situations where the lib internally walks...

You're best off asking stuff like this on stackoverflow.com - this repo is for confirmed issues or feature requests; you'll get more eyes, and more responsive eyes over there When...