Martin Barisits
Martin Barisits
For me this is ok, but @cserf or @ChristophAmes should really comment on this, as the experts. 🔔
@labkode suspects this is an ingress issue. Being followed up.
Hi Hasan, I think this is the right way to do it. Just pinging @ChristophAmes if he has any other suggestions.
* Need to add the trace schema to the documentation; * Then later on, enforce it
👍 Maybe `trace-processor` would be better. It's a little bit of both.
I agree that we should get all VO-specific code out of the upstream repo. For the VO-specific CI tests I am not so sure though. I think there is a...
@jamesp-epcc @rdimaio just an update on this * @cserf agreed that the belle 2 package can be removed (We will need some kind of hack for that since they do...
Belle II is on a much older Rucio version at the moment. So it can be removed without breaking anything immediately. Once they move to Rucio 36, this would have...
I am not completely against it, but I am also not sure if the benefit is worth the effort :-)
Good question. @cserf ? This could certainly be replaced by `*` which is a built-in operator for any RSE.