Wolfgang Bangerth

I don't think this is going to make it for 9.4. Re-tagging for 9.5.

Hm, this warning strikes me as wrong. To use a variable, all you need is a *declaration*. It is not generally necessary to see a definition. I also don't quite...

I don't understand the rationale for the warning. I vote to disable.

I find the warning pointless since you're going to get an error downstream if you get it wrong. #3713 seemed like the right decision -- thanks, @tamiko !

@drwells Any news?

Needs to wait for the next release to be completely finished.

Unrelated to the concrete patch here -- doesn't PETSc also wrap SuperLU and could use that solver?

On 4/7/20 12:56 AM, Paras Kumar wrote: > Unrelated to the concrete patch here -- doesn't PETSc also wrap SuperLU > and could use that solver? > > According to...

`ctest -R regex` where `regex` is a regular expression that matches your test. In particular, the base name of the test (i.e., without the `.cc`) will do as regular expression.

Did you run `make setup_tests`?