Create symbols for resource path segments

[rdulmina]

Purpose

$title

Fixes #37604

Check List

• [x] Read the Contributing Guide
• [ ] Updated Change Log
• [ ] Checked Tooling Support (#<Issue Number>)
• [ ] Added necessary tests
  • [ ] Unit Tests
  • [ ] Spec Conformance Tests
  • [ ] Integration Tests
  • [ ] Ballerina By Example Tests
• [ ] Increased Test Coverage
• [ ] Added necessary documentation
  • [ ] API documentation
  • [ ] Module documentation in Module.md files
  • [ ] Ballerina By Examples

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Base: 76.63% // Head: 76.34% // Decreases project coverage by -0.29% :warning:

Coverage data is based on head (4567ed4) compared to base (a0551a0). Patch coverage: 87.91% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                 Coverage Diff                  @@
##             2201.3.0-stage   #38163      +/-   ##
====================================================
- Coverage             76.63%   76.34%   -0.30%     
- Complexity            53045    53118      +73     
====================================================
  Files                  3354     3390      +36     
  Lines                199136   200365    +1229     
  Branches              25834    25998     +164     
====================================================
+ Hits                 152605   152965     +360     
- Misses                37859    38724     +865     
- Partials               8672     8676       +4     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...symbols/resourcepath/BallerinaPathSegmentList.java	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...wso2/ballerinalang/compiler/bir/model/BIRNode.java	85.23% <ø> (ø)
...alang/compiler/desugar/DeclarativeAuthDesugar.java	23.80% <ø> (+0.63%)	:arrow_up:
...compiler/semantics/analyzer/IsolationAnalyzer.java	84.88% <ø> (+0.01%)	:arrow_up:
...compiler/semantics/analyzer/TypeParamAnalyzer.java	85.94% <0.00%> (+0.07%)	:arrow_up:
...compiler/semantics/model/symbols/BClassSymbol.java	80.00% <ø> (ø)
...iler/semantics/model/symbols/BErrorTypeSymbol.java	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...iler/semantics/model/symbols/BInvokableSymbol.java	89.47% <ø> (ø)
.../semantics/model/symbols/BInvokableTypeSymbol.java	100.00% <ø> (ø)
...g/compiler/semantics/model/symbols/BLetSymbol.java	100.00% <ø> (ø)
... and 189 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[rdulmina]

Will fix the build. Can start reviewing

[dulajdilshan]

When looking at the path-symbols of the target-func, we get symbols (BResourcePathSegmentSymbol). Here, symbol-kinf information is missing.

We want to distinguish between path symbols between

• Rest param
• path param
• identifier segment

@rdulmina What do we need to do here?

[rdulmina]

When looking at the path-symbols of the target-func, we get symbols (BResourcePathSegmentSymbol). Here, symbol-kinf information is missing.

We want to distinguish between path symbols between

* Rest param

* path param

* identifier segment

@rdulmina What do we need to do here?

@gimantha @KavinduZoysa should we create symTags for each kind? Currently we have only one kind for 3 of them

[dulajdilshan]

Kind is always `null` in `BResourcePathSegmentSymbol`. Is this intentional?

[rdulmina]

Kind is always `null` in `BResourcePathSegmentSymbol`. Is this intentional?

No, will add kinds

[gimantha]

We need to send this changes to master as well