balejk

> However I believe my suggestion for no due date being equal to infinity > rather than zero still holds - what do you think about it @WhyNotHugo? So looking...

> I think we can add support for something like `--sort=due:null-first` or `--sort=due:null-last`. That would probably be a good compromise, although personally I would be fine with it being fixed...

Relevant mutt [issue](https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/issues/336). I shoud have looked at it sooner as it seems [their solution](https://gitlab.com/muttmua/mutt/-/commit/191b0513b43d5e603f99292faa5f8ebcc1be3823) is a bit more complicated than what I did and they claim it does what...

No problem, @flatcap. If I thought to check how mutt handles this before, I wouldn't have opened this until I understood what they did and why. I intend to see...

Will do, thanks for now!

@vuori Thank you for the remarks. Sadly, I still haven't found the time to get into this (and I'm afraid it will still be like that for quiet some time),...

Awesome! It will definitely be a huge help that I won't have to set up a server myself, thanks :-)

So I have finally started looking into this again. I have gone through the mutt commits and added a second commit to change the conditions for invoking `smtp_authenticate`. The behaviour...

vuori, 2024-05-21T12:33:33-07:00: > I didn't have a chance to test the PR itself yet, but I mailed you the keys for a test server that expects client cert + password...

I have rebased and updated commit messages. If we decide to keep the second commit, I'd probably want to split out the certificate SASL EXTERNAL enablement into a separate one...