Kevin Gibbons
Kevin Gibbons
Tests for https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1753.
See https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1732. Tests at https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/46198. The above spec PR adds a `bytes()` method to get a Uint8Array to Body, instead of requiring users to get an ArrayBuffer with `arrayBuffer()` and...
See https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1732. Tests at https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/pull/46198. The above spec PR adds a `bytes()` method to get a Uint8Array to Body, instead of requiring users to get an ArrayBuffer with `arrayBuffer()` and...
### Proposal See - https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1753 - https://github.com/w3c/FileAPI/pull/198 - https://github.com/w3c/push-api/pull/370 ### Browser support This is a new proposed feature, not yet implemented anywhere. ### Tasks - [ ] ### Dependencies -...
`takeUntil` taking an Observable is kind of handy, and matches [RxJS](https://www.learnrxjs.io/learn-rxjs/operators/filtering/takeuntil), but it's inconsistent with the web platform's existing [`waitUntil`](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/ExtendableEvent/waitUntil) method, which takes a Promise. I would hope they could...
@michaelficarra and I have been thinking about what other iterator helper methods we'd like to pursue, and have the following extremely tentative list. This doesn't represent the opinion of TC39...
[RxJS observables are async iterable](https://github.com/ReactiveX/rxjs/pull/7189) (implemented using an [unbounded buffer](https://github.com/ReactiveX/rxjs/blob/2947583bb33e97f3db9e6d9f6cea70c62a173060/src/internal/Observable.ts#L418)). There's some good discussion of considerations and tradeoffs linked from that thread. Something to consider here. ```js // click-and-drag handler...
The [proposal for Math.sumPrecise](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-math-sum) is now stage 2.7. I've written tests which exercise - the basic property descriptor - the behavior for iterables, and non-iterable arguments - rejection of non-Number...
so social media previews don't look like this: The user can supply one in the metadata block. We should remember to update the template-for-proposals so people actually remember to do...
- [x] Chrome: shipping in 112 - [status](https://chromestatus.com/feature/5200195346759680) - [x] Safari: shipping in 16.4 - [release notes](https://developer.apple.com/documentation/safari-release-notes/safari-16_4-release-notes) - [x] Firefox: shipping in 115 - [bug](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1825005)