Kevin Gibbons

I'm happy to update to add the classes reffy expects around the list of contributors. Since we're not already tracking organizations and you say it's not essential I'll just stick...

I see that the previous spec text was inconsistent with [the example execution](https://tc39.es/ecma262/multipage/ecmascript-language-scripts-and-modules.html#sec-example-cyclic-module-record-graphs), so in that sense something here should certainly be fixed. I'm having trouble figuring out what if...

There are lots of methods in the language which produce string-keyed collections. Should we generally want to add record-producing versions of all of them? I think no. We should instead...

I note that this races with two new usages of `Return.` in https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/1668, and whichever lands second will need to be rebased. I'm happy to do that myself, I'm just...

I would prefer not to further complicate the distinction between normal and abrupt completions, I think.

This should wait on https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2413 / https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2429, which touch several of the same places.

> I'm curious why you flipped the `If _destructuring_` conditions from `*false*` to `*true*`. A weak preference for `if`/`else` branches to be ordered "true" then "false", in the absence of...

> whether namespace objects should have a [@@toStringTag] property Yes, [per the July 2020 meeting](https://github.com/tc39/notes/blob/5a3580a5a057f3160338025acc2b674e03cc00a3/meetings/2020-07/july-20.md#adding-reflectsymboltostringtag-2057) (see https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2057).

I think this is good to go now but will wait to merge until other editors confirm.

cf https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/1542 and linked issues.