Kevin Gibbons

If these are going to be exposed it may make sense to give them more useful names - e.g. prefix all the type names with "ParseArgs[...]", like "ParseArgsToken". There's a...

@peterblazejewicz were this a module name, I'd agree - `import type { ParseArgsToken } from 'node:parseArgs'` would be silly. But `parseArgs` isn't in its own module; it's in `util`, which...

This is a problem for [all of the samples](https://github.com/googleworkspace/node-samples/search?q=Enter+the+code+from+that+page+here), not just adminSDK. @sqrrrl (sorry if you are not the appropriate person to ping; I'm not sure who maintains this): All...

The name of this type in this proposal affects far, far more people than the name of the spec-internal type, so please don't let this conflict affect your choice of...

> If arrays can spread Arrays and NodeLists, Tuples must be able to as well, but the same logic. Ehhh.... NodeLists contain non-primitives pretty much by definition. I am entirely...

#133 is talking about a different feature than what I am discussing here; see my second paragraph. I would find it pretty strange to pass a Record to a method...

Note that https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/2495 has the relevant normative change, and https://github.com/tc39/test262/pull/3181 has the corresponding test.

@mathiasbynens, for what it's worth, I would be very surprised if those names were changed without `--mangle.topLevel`. I expect the default behavior to be that compiled programs have the same...

Probably in addition to "resume"; that is, both resume the execution context and then explicitly transfer control to it.

> In the editors' call, there seemed to be some opposition to this plan, but I didn't really catch why. There is always a cost to factoring stuff out, which...