Chris Ward

Yup. #132 is ready to go and it will also add in Travis CI. I'm also happy to split up the PR, as it's doing quite a bit of stuff.

@benjaminapetersen Travis CI is now setup.

> Other question: why not use a uniform domain like this: > > ``` > { > type: feet > amount: 1 > } > { > type: hour >...

@tognee Have you had a chance to look at this any more? It's okay if you don't time anymore.

I think that sounds reasonable. It will be a lot of manual entry though. But I don't think that can be avoided.

I think it might be more complicated but if you want to take a shot, feel free!

I'm going to repeat here what I wrote on the PR so it's on the original issue. I think all of these: ``` '10 in humanoid form, 11 (natural armor)...

>fwiw I don't think we should have markdown italics in this field as none of the other fields have markdown (language, senses, etc) Yeah. Markdown only really makes sense in...

I think that first one would end up being: ``` { "armor_class": 12 "armor_type": "natural", "armor_special": "15 with mage armor" }, ``` How would you want to handle multiple ACs...

Though I'm not 100% sold on it.