badlop
badlop
Timeline: - https://github.com/processone/ejabberd/commit/ed124e15e9e2705ad9d5cddae284b85efd90fe7f: `make install` was implemented - https://github.com/processone/ejabberd/commit/bfb7583bb287e3e4ccabdf8b7e109702366b2971: `make uninstall` was added - https://github.com/processone/ejabberd/commit/4d8f7706240a1603468968f47fc7b150b788d62f: The rebar2 build tool was introduced, but the libraries were simply copied - https://github.com/processone/ejabberd/commit/70606667c60bfc3196defe86056a5eb77841dfd5: `make...
Right, clients can implement that XEP, and no need for the server to do anything special, just let the presence stanzas go as usual. Curiously, any server "does implement" the...
What to do with this issue?
> it's possible to use your patch on last version of ejabberd? Yes. I've rebased to `master` the branch `1611` which includes both patches, see it in https://github.com/badlop/ejabberd/commits/1611 The container...
Looking at the patch, it gets the nick from the presence stanza, "nick" tag Installer based in 22.10: https://github.com/badlop/ejabberd/actions/runs/4166669090 Container: https://github.com/badlop/ejabberd/pkgs/container/ejabberd/70245962?tag=1611
Yes, it was built using 22.10 + some patches, as seen on the corresponding git branch. For some reason it didn't pick the proper version number. By the way, it's...
@Vladimir7i, were you able to test the patch? And does it solve the problem?
> But I actually don't tested it at the moment=( it's possible to download it again? because I lost a lot of data and my prew patch=( Installers are in...
Any new information about this problem?
> Why does the first offline message get stored also in the spool table if we enable mam for mod_offline? That was first implemented in https://github.com/processone/ejabberd/commit/571a786b9b6e18a861de4767df3ca7fe1147631f. Looking at the commit...