[Meta] Should ECMA262 pull requests be listed here or just as issues on the main repository?

[Jamesernator]

Because not everything put through TC39 goes through the proposal process there should probably be some tracking of the so called "Needs consensus PRs". It's probably not worth tracking the many ones that are pending or didn't achieve consensus in Babel but any that have achieved consensus should almost certainly be tracked in Babel.

Here's a short list of some of the recent consensus-achieved PRs and their status in Babel:

PR	Babel Status	Notes
#785	Fixed (in polyfill)
#833	Not fixed	Fixable if Proxy itself is already available
#984	Not fixed	Still a runtime early but should be early error in Babylon
#988 / #1021	Not fixed
#890	Not fixed
#1005	Fixed	Already a babel transform

[ljharb]

You can also use https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/labels/has%20consensus and https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/labels/needs%20consensus to locate these.