Olabode Lawal-Shittabey

> Will you also add unit tests for success.js? Yea, working on that 😉

> I'll investigate further though 🤞 @gr2m turns out the reason why the issue isn't getting seen is because of the `owner/repo` details in the url not matching the current...

### New Commit - Added new property `type` to the `issue.user` object... This was done to allow for more configuration ability.. hence patching a solution to https://github.com/semantic-release/github/issues/529 via configuration. -...

### Convert PR to Draft I have converted PR to draft for the following reason... - Currently, when we fetch `associatedPRs` on commits, we get a sophisticated pull request object...

Hi @The-CodeINN, Gotta start by saying great stuff with the change here! 😉 But, it's always imperative to ask to work on an issue, wait for it to be assigned...

Please continue with this PR, just remove changes associated to the logout feature 😉

Hi @effektsvk, How are you currently running these "dry run release on PRs (specifically Renovate PRs)"!? I'd assume its through GitHub Actions!? i.e. you are running `semantic-release` directly from the...

> I can set up the environment again and test if you need that information, but `--no-ci` only helped me when running locally on my computer. Please do, and make...

[_.template](https://lodash.com/docs/4.17.15#template) is an option that is viable regardless of a users' semantic-release configuration file form which as said in the doc can be... > written in `YAML` or `JSON`, with...

Hi @DominusKelvin Is there some sort of design (figma) file to guide the development of this views?