fix(DB): Portal: Karazhan usable in battlegrounds

[Hellcat404]

Changes Proposed:

This PR proposes changes to:

• [ ] Core (units, players, creatures, game systems).
• [ ] Scripts (bosses, spell scripts, creature scripts).
• [x] Database (SAI, creatures, etc).

Issues Addressed:

• Closes https://github.com/azerothcore/azerothcore-wotlk/issues/18173

SOURCE:

The changes have been validated through:

• [ ] Live research (checked on live servers, e.g Classic WotLK, Retail, etc.)
• [ ] Sniffs (remember to share them with the open source community!)
• [ ] Video evidence, knowledge databases or other public sources (e.g forums, Wowhead, etc.)
• [ ] The changes promoted by this pull request come partially or entirely from another project (cherry-pick). Cherry-picks must be committed using the proper --author tag in order to be accepted, thus crediting the original authors, unless otherwise unable to be found

Tests Performed:

This PR has been:

• [x] Tested in-game by the author.
• [ ] Tested in-game by other community members/someone else other than the author/has been live on production servers.
• [ ] This pull request requires further testing and may have edge cases to be tested.

How to Test the Changes:

• [x] This pull request can be tested by following the reproduction steps provided in the linked issue
• [ ] This pull request requires further testing. Provide steps to test your changes. If it requires any specific setup e.g multiple players please specify it as well.

How to Test AzerothCore PRs

When a PR is ready to be tested, it will be marked as [WAITING TO BE TESTED].

You can help by testing PRs and writing your feedback here on the PR's page on GitHub. Follow the instructions here:

http://www.azerothcore.org/wiki/How-to-test-a-PR

REMEMBER: when testing a PR that changes something generic (i.e. a part of code that handles more than one specific thing), the tester should not only check that the PR does its job (e.g. fixing spell XXX) but especially check that the PR does not cause any regression (i.e. introducing new bugs).

For example: if a PR fixes spell X by changing a part of code that handles spells X, Y, and Z, we should not only test X, but we should test Y and Z as well.

[Nyeriah]

Might not be possible to check but there's a spell attribute to prevent casting in pvp zones. Depending on the message sent to client when spell fails maybe that should be used instead of disable. I dont remember how disables handle this specifically tbh

[Hellcat404]

After taking a look, I think you're right - I'll make a change in conditions to give a spell cast result instead of using disables.

I saw the ritual of summoning disable in the database but I think that should also be moved to conditions

[pangolp]

Update the SQL file. But I'm not sure how to test this.

3 queries executed, 3 success, 0 errors, 0 warnings

Query: DELETE FROM `disables` WHERE `sourceType`=0 AND `entry`=698

0 row(s) affected

Execution Time : 0 sec
Transfer Time  : 0.001 sec
Total Time     : 0.001 sec
-----------------------------------------------------------

Query: DELETE FROM `conditions` WHERE `SourceTypeOrReferenceId`=17 AND `SourceGroup`=0 AND `SourceEntry` IN (698, 28148) AND `Condition...

12 row(s) affected

Execution Time : 0 sec
Transfer Time  : 0 sec
Total Time     : 0 sec
-----------------------------------------------------------

Query: INSERT INTO `conditions` (`SourceTypeOrReferenceId`, `SourceGroup`, `SourceEntry`, `SourceId`, `ElseGroup`, `ConditionTypeOrRefe...

12 row(s) affected

Execution Time : 0 sec
Transfer Time  : 0 sec
Total Time     : 0 sec