Alberto Berti

@lucianolev thanks, that's a more useful reason to fix this up, as soon as I have some time to spare on this even if at the moment I'm not using...

No, it's not deep: the check is here https://github.com/metapensiero/metapensiero.pj/blob/6c6cd34a38989bbd10050c33e401111fdc4d8d18/src/metapensiero/pj/transformations/classes.py#L162 which is where classess gets translated and then it's used into the function translator here https://github.com/metapensiero/metapensiero.pj/blob/6c6cd34a38989bbd10050c33e401111fdc4d8d18/src/metapensiero/pj/transformations/functions.py#L81 . The function translator is...

Thanks @djmattyg007

Thanks for reporting. The purpose of this project is more that of helping the developer that has to frequently switch from python to js during development, rather than a one-to-one...

> I've investigated this a bit further, and it looks like pj already supports set([...]) No you're getting it wrong: pj as no special support for sets: ``` $ pj...

i'm not sure if JavaScripthon shoud work as a generic syntax-checker, especially on a statement that it sould ignore ;-)

One, the fact that when someone uses JavaScripthon he may think that it also does some kind code checking, more than what the Python's parser alone does. It is not......

If you are so kind to submit this together with a small test there's no problem, thanks! Otherwise i'll add it next time I've some time to dedicate to this...

Il 5 luglio 2021 06:09:37 EEST, Eric Perriard ***@***.***> ha scritto: >Python code: > >`for i in range(3, 1, -1):` > >Now produces: > >`for (var i = 3, _pj_a...

Hi Joe, thanks for using JavaScripthon! >>>>> Joe Rickerby ***@***.***> writes: > Hi there! This is a very interesting project to me, currently trying to assess if it will solve...