Omit coverage for code with no logic

[lee-cordell]

Is it possible to limit code coverage to only properties and methods that are above a given cyclomatic complexity? This would avoid having to at unit tests for constructors, methods and properties with no logic and no calls to dependencies.

Responding to your point on the Marketplace: yes I'd have a go at implementing this if you could offer some info.

[axodox]

OK. I will get back to you with the info at the weekend.