Adam Wulkiewicz

Indeed there is more headers in `geometries` dir. I was thinking about "regular" models defined in BG, nothing from `adapted` directory since these headers depend on other libraries and probably...

Thanks! I can reproduce it. This is how it looks like:  and up close:  Blue is the segment densified in cartesian and orange is the segment densified in...

Note that if the boxes are converted to rings/polygons like that: ``` using Ring = bg::model::ring; Ring ringWest, ringEast; bg::convert(boxWest, ringWest); bg::convert(boxEast, ringEast); ``` the result is the expected one....

@mapman63 We have to implement geographic and spherical segment-box intersection strategies. > Actually, in my case I do want to use precisely the boxes and not the rings. My point...

Hi, actually it is possible to specify the `CalculationType` used in `centroid()` algorithm. You can do this by passing a strategy explicitly however only the strategy for areal geometries like...

@barendgehrels Considering you've made many changes in the strategy since 2016 is this PR still relevant?

@barendgehrels Out of curiosity, you're using `andoyer` (so for direct this is `thomas` without the 2nd degree approximation), correct? Have you tried different FormulaPolicies too? In case we didn't know...

@vissarion The choice of projection depends on place on the globe and the usage of the map. For each region of the globe there are some standard ones, e.g. Barend...

@vschoech out of curiosity, why do you need this combination for? Wouldn't checking ``` covered_by(box, return_envelope(multi_polygon)); ``` be enough?

@vschoech Sorry, may bad. I confused the covered with the covering geometry. Yes, I can see that this may be useful in particular with relatively big concave polygons. In general...