aws-cdk-rfcs
aws-cdk-rfcs copied to clipboard
CDK environment setup for platform/system administrators
Description
CDK is tricky to use in restricted environments where there is a split between the platform/system administrator teams, and the application development teams who use CDK.
This RFC proposes a set of features for dealing with that problem.
Roles
Role | User |
---|---|
Proposed by | @skinny85 |
Author(s) | @skinny85 |
API Bar Raiser | @rix0rrr |
Stakeholders | @cgarvis, @addihorowitz, @rix0rrr |
See RFC Process for details
Workflow
- [x] Tracking issue created (label:
status/proposed
) - [x] API bar raiser assigned (ping us at #aws-cdk-rfcs if needed)
- [x] Kick off meeting
- [x] RFC pull request submitted (label:
status/review
) - [ ] Community reach out (via Slack and/or Twitter)
- [ ] API signed-off (label
api-approved
applied to pull request) - [ ] Final comments period (label:
status/final-comments-period
) - [ ] Approved and merged (label:
status/approved
) - [ ] Execution plan submitted (label:
status/planning
) - [ ] Plan approved and merged (label:
status/implementing
) - [ ] Implementation complete (label:
status/done
)
Author is responsible to progress the RFC according to this checklist, and apply the relevant labels to this issue so that the RFC table in README gets updated.
@rix0rrr I've assigned you as the API bar raiser on this one, let me know if you disagree.
Pull Request with the RFC: https://github.com/aws/aws-cdk-rfcs/pull/421.
Marking this RFCs as stale
since there has been little recent activity and it is not currently close to getting accepted as-is. We appreciate the effort that has gone into this proposal. Marking an RFCs as stale is not a one-way door. If you have made substantial changes to the proposal, please open a new issue/RFC. You might also consider raising a PR to aws/aws-cdk directly or self-publishing to Construct Hub.