SQL - Type instantiation is excessively deep and possibly infinite.ts(2589)

[kekami]

Environment information

System:
  OS: macOS 14.4.1
  CPU: (10) arm64 Apple M1 Max
  Memory: 109.48 MB / 32.00 GB
  Shell: /bin/zsh
Binaries:
  Node: 20.12.2 - ~/.nvm/versions/node/v20.12.2/bin/node
  Yarn: 1.22.22 - ~/.nvm/versions/node/v20.12.2/bin/yarn
  npm: 10.5.0 - ~/.nvm/versions/node/v20.12.2/bin/npm
  pnpm: 9.1.0 - ~/.nvm/versions/node/v20.12.2/bin/pnpm
NPM Packages:
  @aws-amplify/backend: 1.0.1
  @aws-amplify/backend-cli: 1.0.2
  aws-amplify: 6.3.0
  aws-cdk: 2.137.0
  aws-cdk-lib: 2.137.0
  typescript: 5.4.5
AWS environment variables:
  AWS_SDK_LOAD_CONFIG = 1
  AWS_STS_REGIONAL_ENDPOINTS = regional
  AWS_NODEJS_CONNECTION_REUSE_ENABLED = 1
No CDK environment variables

Description

Keep on hitting Type instantiation is excessively deep and possibly infinite.ts(2589) while working with the sql schema.

Repro:

// schema.sql.ts

/* eslint-disable */
/* THIS IS AN AUTOGENERATED FILE. DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE DIRECTLY. */
import { a } from "@aws-amplify/data-schema";
import { configure } from "@aws-amplify/data-schema/internals";
import { secret } from "@aws-amplify/backend";

export const schema = configure({
  database: {
    identifier: "foobar",
    engine: "postgresql",
    connectionUri: secret("SQL_CONNECTION_STRING"),
  },
}).schema({
  customers: a
    .model({
      id: a.id().required(),
      first_name: a.string(),
      last_name: a.string(),
      date_of_birth: a.string(),
      email: a.string(),
      phone: a.string(),
      owner: a.string(),
      stripe_customer_id: a.string(),
    })
    .identifier(["id"]),
  employees: a
    .model({
      id: a.id().required(),
      first_name: a.string(),
      last_name: a.string(),
      date_of_birth: a.string(),
      phone: a.string(),
      owner: a.string().required(),
      email: a.string(),
    })
    .identifier(["id"]),
  retainers: a
    .model({
      id: a.id().required(),
      customer_id: a.string().required(),
      employee_id: a.string().required(),
      owners: a.string().required().array(),
    })
    .identifier(["id"]),
  shifts: a
    .model({
      id: a.id().required(),
      start_time: a.datetime().required(),
      end_time: a.datetime().required(),
      employee_id: a.string().required(),
      retainer_id: a.string().required(),
      owners: a.string().required().array(),
    })
    .identifier(["id"]),
  spatial_ref_sys: a
    .model({
      srid: a.integer().required(),
      auth_name: a.string(),
      auth_srid: a.integer(),
      srtext: a.string(),
      proj4text: a.string(),
    })
    .identifier(["srid"]),
});

// resource.ts

import { type ClientSchema, a, defineData } from "@aws-amplify/backend";

import { schema as generatedSqlSchema } from "./schema.sql.js";

const sqlSchema = generatedSqlSchema
  .renameModels(() => [
    ["employees", "Employee"],
    ["customers", "Customer"],
    ["shifts", "Shift"],
    ["retainers", "Retainer"],
  ])
  .setRelationships((models) => [
    models.Employee.relationships({
      retainers: a.hasMany("Retainer", "employee_id"),
      shifts: a.hasMany("Shift", "employee_id"),
    }),
    models.Customer.relationships({
      retainers: a.hasMany("Retainer", "customer_id"),
    }),
    models.Retainer.relationships({
      shifts: a.hasMany("Shift", "retainer_id"),
      employee: a.belongsTo("Employee", "employee_id"),
      customer: a.belongsTo("Customer", "customer_id"),
    }),
    models.Shift.relationships({
      retainer: a.belongsTo("Retainer", "retainer_id"),
      employee: a.belongsTo("Employee", "employee_id"),
    }),
  ])
  .setAuthorization((models) => [
    models.Employee.authorization((allow) => [allow.ownerDefinedIn("owner")]),
    models.Customer.authorization((allow) => [allow.ownerDefinedIn("owner")]),
    models.Retainer.authorization((allow) => [allow.ownersDefinedIn("owners")]),
    models.Shift.authorization((allow) => [allow.ownersDefinedIn("owners")]),
  ]);

export type Schema = ClientSchema<typeof sqlSchema>;

export const data = defineData({
  schema: sqlSchema,
});

[AnilMaktala]

Hey @kekami, Thanks for raising this. We made some improvements in our types internally and it will address this issue. We will let you know once it is released.

[kekami]

Hey @AnilMaktala how is it going with the fix?

If you want me to validate the fix against my schema, which has grown significantly since this issue was posted, just let me know. I'd be happy to try it.

[renebrandel]

@kekami - can you upgrade to the latest version? This should be resolved in latest backend / data version. Check in your package-lock that the @aws-amplify/data-schema subpackage is 1.3.0

[kekami]

@kekami - can you upgrade to the latest version? This should be resolved in latest backend / data version. Check in your package-lock that the @aws-amplify/data-schema subpackage is 1.3.0

Hi @renebrandel, I am on the latest backend, the subpackage was still on 1.2.5. However, bumping it did not help, the issue remains.

[renebrandel]

did you remove your package-lock.json and node_modules folder?

[renebrandel]

in my local version (with your exact schema) it seems to work now:

[renebrandel]

maybe also try: npm update @aws-amplify/data-schema

[kekami]

You are right! My old schema now works. However my current one is a tad bigger 😅 And is still experiencing problems.

schema.sql.ts

/* eslint-disable */
/* THIS IS AN AUTOGENERATED FILE. DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE DIRECTLY. */
import { a } from "@aws-amplify/data-schema";
import { configure } from "@aws-amplify/data-schema/internals";
import { secret } from "@aws-amplify/backend";

export const schema = configure({
    database: {
        identifier: "IDrpwRgsiPF0pVZSGUYZ6Hw",
        engine: "postgresql",
        connectionUri: secret("SQL_CONNECTION_STRING_PLAYGROUND")
    }
}).schema({
    "assignments": a.model({
        id: a.id().required(),
        contract_id: a.id().required(),
        start_date: a.date(),
        end_date: a.date(),
        owners: a.string().array(),
        created_at: a.datetime(),
        updated_at: a.datetime(),
        user_id: a.id().required(),
        owner: a.string()
    }).identifier([
        "id"
    ]),
    "billing_details": a.model({
        id: a.id().required(),
        contract_id: a.id().required(),
        billing_address: a.string(),
        payment_method: a.string(),
        card_number: a.string(),
        card_expiry_date: a.date(),
        card_cvc: a.string(),
        owners: a.string().array(),
        created_at: a.datetime(),
        updated_at: a.datetime()
    }).identifier([
        "id"
    ]),
    "certifications": a.model({
        id: a.id().required(),
        certification_name: a.string().required(),
        issued_by: a.string(),
        issue_date: a.date().required(),
        expiry_date: a.date(),
        owners: a.string().array(),
        created_at: a.datetime(),
        updated_at: a.datetime(),
        user_id: a.id().required()
    }).identifier([
        "id"
    ]),
    "contracts": a.model({
        id: a.id().required(),
        start_date: a.date(),
        end_date: a.date(),
        client_type: a.string().required(),
        user_id: a.id().required(),
        organisation_id: a.id(),
        owners: a.string().array(),
        created_at: a.datetime(),
        updated_at: a.datetime()
    }).identifier([
        "id"
    ]),
    "employments": a.model({
        id: a.id().required(),
        owners: a.string().array(),
        created_at: a.datetime(),
        updated_at: a.datetime(),
        user_id: a.id().required()
    }).identifier([
        "id"
    ]),
    "identity_verifications": a.model({
        id: a.id().required(),
        user_id: a.id().required(),
        status: a.string(),
        errormsg: a.string(),
        errorcode: a.integer(),
        owner: a.string(),
        created_at: a.datetime(),
        updated_at: a.datetime(),
        order_ref: a.string(),
        auto_start_token: a.string(),
        qr_start_token: a.string()
    }).identifier([
        "id"
    ]),
    "invoice_rows": a.model({
        id: a.id().required(),
        invoice_id: a.id().required(),
        description: a.string().required(),
        quantity: a.integer().required(),
        unit_price: a.float().required(),
        unit_type: a.string().required(),
        owners: a.string().array(),
        created_at: a.datetime(),
        updated_at: a.datetime()
    }).identifier([
        "id"
    ]),
    "invoices": a.model({
        id: a.id().required(),
        contract_id: a.id(),
        issue_date: a.date().required(),
        due_date: a.date().required(),
        amount: a.float().required(),
        status: a.string().required(),
        owners: a.string().array(),
        created_at: a.datetime(),
        updated_at: a.datetime(),
        user_id: a.id().required()
    }).identifier([
        "id"
    ]),
    "organisation_users": a.model({
        id: a.id().required(),
        organisation_id: a.id().required(),
        user_id: a.id().required(),
        owners: a.string().array(),
        created_at: a.datetime(),
        updated_at: a.datetime()
    }).identifier([
        "id"
    ]),
    "organisations": a.model({
        id: a.id().required(),
        organisation_name: a.string().required(),
        type: a.string().required(),
        contact_person_id: a.id().required(),
        owners: a.string().array(),
        created_at: a.datetime(),
        updated_at: a.datetime()
    }).identifier([
        "id"
    ]),
    "payments": a.model({
        id: a.id().required(),
        invoice_id: a.id(),
        payment_date: a.date().required(),
        amount: a.float().required(),
        owners: a.string().array(),
        created_at: a.datetime(),
        updated_at: a.datetime(),
        user_id: a.id().required()
    }).identifier([
        "id"
    ]),
    "salaries": a.model({
        id: a.id().required(),
        payment_date: a.date().required(),
        amount: a.float().required(),
        owners: a.string().array(),
        created_at: a.datetime(),
        updated_at: a.datetime(),
        user_id: a.id().required()
    }).identifier([
        "id"
    ]),
    "salary_rows": a.model({
        id: a.id().required(),
        salary_id: a.id().required(),
        description: a.string(),
        quantity: a.integer().required(),
        unit_price: a.float().required(),
        unit_type: a.string().required(),
        owners: a.string().array(),
        created_at: a.datetime(),
        updated_at: a.datetime()
    }).identifier([
        "id"
    ]),
    "shifts": a.model({
        id: a.id().required(),
        assignment_id: a.id().required(),
        start_time: a.datetime().required(),
        end_time: a.datetime().required(),
        owners: a.string().array(),
        created_at: a.datetime(),
        updated_at: a.datetime(),
        user_id: a.id().required()
    }).identifier([
        "id"
    ]),
    "time_reports": a.model({
        id: a.id().required(),
        shift_id: a.id().required(),
        start_time: a.datetime().required(),
        end_time: a.datetime().required(),
        note: a.string(),
        owners: a.string().array(),
        created_at: a.datetime(),
        updated_at: a.datetime(),
        user_id: a.id().required()
    }).identifier([
        "id"
    ]),
    "users": a.model({
        id: a.id().required(),
        username: a.string().required(),
        role: a.string().required(),
        first_name: a.string(),
        last_name: a.string(),
        email: a.string().required(),
        phone_number: a.string(),
        identity_verified: a.boolean(),
        created_at: a.datetime(),
        updated_at: a.datetime(),
        stripe_customer_id: a.string()
    }).identifier([
        "id"
    ])
});

resource.ts

import {
  type ClientSchema,
  a,
  defineData,
} from '@aws-amplify/backend';

import { schema as generatedSqlSchema } from './schema.sql.js';

const sqlSchema = generatedSqlSchema
  .renameModels(() => [
    ['assignments', 'Assignment'],
    ['billing_details', 'BillingDetail'],
    ['contracts', 'Contract'],
    ['employments', 'Employment'],
    ['identity_verifications', 'IdentityVerification'],
    ['invoices', 'Invoice'],
    ['invoice_rows', 'InvoiceRow'],
    ['organisation_users', 'OrganisationUser'],
    ['organisations', 'Organisation'],
    ['payments', 'Payment'],
    ['salaries', 'Salary'],
    ['salary_rows', 'SalaryRow'],
    ['shifts', 'Shift'],
    ['time_reports', 'TimeReport'],
    ['users', 'User'],
  ])
  .setRelationships((models) => [
    models.Assignment.relationships({
      contract: a.belongsTo('Contract', 'contract_id'),
      shifts: a.hasMany('Shift', 'assignment_id'),
      user: a.belongsTo('User', 'user_id'),
    }),

    models.Contract.relationships({
      assignments: a.hasMany('Assignment', 'contract_id'),
      user: a.belongsTo('User', 'user_id'),
      invoices: a.hasMany('Invoice', 'contract_id'),
    }),

    models.Employment.relationships({
      user: a.belongsTo('User', 'user_id'),
    }),

    models.IdentityVerification.relationships({
      user: a.belongsTo('User', 'user_id'),
    }),

    models.Invoice.relationships({
      contract: a.belongsTo('Contract', 'contract_id'),
    }),

    models.Organisation.relationships({
      contact_person: a.belongsTo('User', 'contact_person_id'),
      users: a.hasMany('OrganisationUser', 'organisation_id'),
    }),

    models.OrganisationUser.relationships({
      organisation: a.belongsTo('Organisation', 'organisation_id'),
      user: a.belongsTo('User', 'user_id'),
    }),

    models.TimeReport.relationships({
      shift: a.belongsTo('Shift', 'shift_id'),
    }),

    models.Shift.relationships({
      assignment: a.belongsTo('Assignment', 'assignment_id'),
      time_reports: a.hasMany('TimeReport', 'shift_id'),
      user: a.belongsTo('User', 'user_id'),
    }),

    models.User.relationships({
      assignments: a.hasMany('Assignment', 'user_id'),
      contracts: a.hasMany('Contract', 'user_id'),
      employents: a.hasMany('Employment', 'user_id'),
      identity_verifications: a.hasMany('IdentityVerification', 'user_id'),
      main_contact_organisations: a.hasMany(
        'Organisation',
        'contact_person_id'
      ),
      organisations: a.hasMany('OrganisationUser', 'user_id'),
      shifts: a.hasMany('Shift', 'user_id'),
    }),
  ])
  .setAuthorization((models) => [
    models.User.authorization((allow) => [
      allow.ownerDefinedIn('username'),
      allow.groups(['admin']),
      allow.authenticated().to(['read']),
    ]),
    models.Assignment.authorization((allow) => [
      allow.ownerDefinedIn('owner'),
      allow.groups(['admin']),
    ]),
    models.BillingDetail.authorization((allow) => [
      allow.authenticated(),
      allow.groups(['admin']),
    ]),
    models.Contract.authorization((allow) => [
      allow.authenticated(),
      allow.groups(['admin']),
      allow.custom(),
    ]),
    models.IdentityVerification.authorization((allow) => [
      allow.ownerDefinedIn('owner'),
      allow.authenticated().to(['listen']),
    ]),
    models.Invoice.authorization((allow) => [
      allow.authenticated(),
      allow.groups(['admin']),
    ]),
    models.InvoiceRow.authorization((allow) => [
      allow.authenticated(),
      allow.groups(['admin']),
    ]),
    models.OrganisationUser.authorization((allow) => [
      allow.authenticated(),
      allow.groups(['admin']),
    ]),
    models.Organisation.authorization((allow) => [
      allow.authenticated(),
      allow.groups(['admin']),
    ]),
    models.Payment.authorization((allow) => [
      allow.authenticated(),
      allow.groups(['admin']),
    ]),
    models.Salary.authorization((allow) => [
      allow.authenticated(),
      allow.groups(['admin']),
    ]),
    models.SalaryRow.authorization((allow) => [
      allow.authenticated(),
      allow.groups(['admin']),
    ]),
    models.Shift.authorization((allow) => [
      allow.authenticated(),
      allow.groups(['admin']),
    ]),
    models.TimeReport.authorization((allow) => [
      allow.authenticated(),
      allow.groups(['admin']),
    ])
  ])


export type Schema = ClientSchema<typeof sqlSchema>;

export const data = defineData({
  schema: sqlSchema,
  authorizationModes: {
    defaultAuthorizationMode: 'userPool',
    apiKeyAuthorizationMode: {
      expiresInDays: 30,
    },
  },
});

[kekami]

And yes I tried nuking node_modules and lock files. So should be up to date.

[kekami]

I think you have to create a massive schema to test against, since I seem to be hitting the limits after just a few weeks worth of work ^^

[renebrandel]

Yeah, we've expanded the schema sizes quite a bit but looks like there are still some optimization we need to look into for SQL. The same set on DDB seems to function okay.

It looks like it's the combination of renaming and setting relationships. The problem seems to be if you use both.

[kekami]

Cheers for looking into it! I've ts-ignored it for now, but I do miss type safety land 🥲

Overall the SQL implementation is really enjoyable to use, and it will be rock solid when the few couples of bugs I've found are fixed 💪

[rnrnstar2]

"@aws-amplify/backend": "^1.0.3",
    "@aws-amplify/backend-cli": "^1.0.4",

Although I am updating to the latest version like this, the @aws-amplify/data-schema version does not become 1.3.0. Updating with npm update @aws-amplify/data-schema does not change anything.

"node_modules/@aws-amplify/api-graphql": {
      "version": "4.1.4",
      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@aws-amplify/api-graphql/-/api-graphql-4.1.4.tgz",
      "integrity": "sha512-kZemNvJhFVWjMVgWwereelEvtb+6Ruj16ntCZ6PcgmBVkH2BiH0VamH+t8WkoL8bI2mSYGtmEBhCvVXv9QFlFw==",
      "dependencies": {
        "@aws-amplify/api-rest": "4.0.33",
        "@aws-amplify/core": "6.3.1",
        "@aws-amplify/data-schema": "^1.0.0",
        "@aws-sdk/types": "3.387.0",
        "graphql": "15.8.0",
        "rxjs": "^7.8.1",
        "tslib": "^2.5.0",
        "uuid": "^9.0.0"
      }
    },

"node_modules/@aws-amplify/backend": {
      "version": "1.0.3",
      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@aws-amplify/backend/-/backend-1.0.3.tgz",
      "integrity": "sha512-/NNEtmu59v4x8Z/vLSmZnw/2PBMQ6RlB8E9glfldf6COs0DOacx4UeoPLRc7+E7eLWpTQWl4mPdSiWdBh5jb+w==",
      "dev": true,
      "dependencies": {
        "@aws-amplify/backend-auth": "^1.0.2",
        "@aws-amplify/backend-data": "^1.0.2",
        "@aws-amplify/backend-function": "^1.0.3",
        "@aws-amplify/backend-output-schemas": "^1.1.0",
        "@aws-amplify/backend-output-storage": "^1.0.1",
        "@aws-amplify/backend-secret": "^1.0.0",
        "@aws-amplify/backend-storage": "^1.0.2",
        "@aws-amplify/client-config": "^1.0.3",
        "@aws-amplify/data-schema": "^1.0.0",
        "@aws-amplify/platform-core": "^1.0.1",
        "@aws-amplify/plugin-types": "^1.0.0",
        "@aws-sdk/client-amplify": "^3.465.0",
        "lodash.snakecase": "^4.1.1"
      },
      "peerDependencies": {
        "aws-cdk-lib": "^2.127.0",
        "constructs": "^10.0.0"
      }
    },

[javabudd]

I think you have to create a massive schema to test against, since I seem to be hitting the limits after just a few weeks worth of work ^^

I have a schema with 2 items in it throwing this issue, I don't believe that's true.

[kekami]

I think you have to create a massive schema to test against, since I seem to be hitting the limits after just a few weeks worth of work ^^

I have a schema with 2 items in it throwing this issue, I don't believe that's true.

Mind sharing the schema here?

[javabudd]

I think you have to create a massive schema to test against, since I seem to be hitting the limits after just a few weeks worth of work ^^

I have a schema with 2 items in it throwing this issue, I don't believe that's true.

Mind sharing the schema here?

const schema = a.schema({
	Device: a
		.model({
			id: a.id().required(),
			blahId: a.id().required(),
			companyId: a.string().required(),
			inventoryId: a.string(),
			siteId: a.string(),
			name: a.string().required(),
			isActive: a.boolean().default(true),
			...dateOps,
			lastSyncedAt: a.datetime(),
			lastGpsEventId: a.id(),
			lastGpsEvent: a.belongsTo('Event', 'lastGpsEventId'),
			lastBatteryEventId: a.id(),
			lastBatteryEvent: a.belongsTo('Event', 'lastBatteryEventId'),
			lastHumidityEventId: a.id(),
			lastHumidityEvent: a.belongsTo('Event', 'lastHumidityEventId'),
			lastTemperatureEventId: a.id(),
			lastTemperatureEvent: a.belongsTo('Event', 'lastTemperatureEventId'),
			lastOccupancyEventId: a.id(),
			lastOccupancyEvent: a.belongsTo('Event', 'lastOccupancyEventId'),
		})
		.secondaryIndexes((index) => [
			index("companyId").sortKeys(["createdAt"]),
			index("blahId"),
		])
		.authorization((allow) => [
				allow.group('superusers'),
				allow.ownerDefinedIn('companyId').identityClaim('companyId').to(
					[
						'read',
						'update',
					]
				)
			]
		),
	User: a
		.model({
			id: a.id().required(),
			owner: a.string().authorization(allow => [
					allow.owner().to(['read']),
					allow.group('superusers')
				]
			),
			companyId: a.string().authorization(allow => [
				allow.owner().to(['read']),
				allow.group('superusers')
			]),
			email: a.email().required(),
			preferences: a.json(),
			...dateOps,
		})
		.authorization((allow) => [
			allow.group('superusers'),
			allow.ownerDefinedIn('companyId').identityClaim('companyId').to(
				[
					'get',
					'list',
					'search',
				]
			),
			allow.owner().to(
				[
					'read',
					'update'
				]
			)
		]),
	Event: a
		.model({
			id: a.id().required(),
			companyId: a.string().required(),
			deviceId: a.string().required(),
			type: a.enum(
				[
					'gps_coordinates',
					'temperature',
					'humidity',
					'battery_level',
					'touch_sensor',
					'daily_occupancy',
					'gas_resistance'
				]
			),
			createdAt: a.datetime().required(),
			value: a.json(),
			gpsDevice: a.hasOne('Device', 'lastGpsEventId'),
			batteryDevice: a.hasOne('Device', 'lastBatteryEventId'),
			humidityDevice: a.hasOne('Device', 'lastHumidityEventId'),
			temperatureDevice: a.hasOne('Device', 'lastTemperatureEventId'),
			occupancyDevice: a.hasOne('Device', 'lastOccupancyEventId')
		})
		.secondaryIndexes((index) => [
			index("companyId").sortKeys(["createdAt"]),
			index("deviceId").sortKeys(["createdAt"]),
		])
		.authorization((allow) => [
			allow.group('superusers'),
			allow.ownerDefinedIn('companyId').identityClaim('companyId').to(
				[
					'read',
				]
			)
		]),
})

[MattWlodarski]

I wanted to add that I get the same thing with my schema. I would share it but it's about 60 data tables with many relationships. I'm using DynamoDB tables. Another issue I picked up on is that the return types of the queries/mutations are usually incorrect as well. This only happens when the schema is too large for typescript to handle. The return type will often have something like this instead of the actual data fields: data: { [x: string]: string[] }

[iartemiev]

@kekami - we made some more type-level optimizations and I'm no longer getting an error with the updated schema you shared in this comment.

Could you please try updating the package again via npm update @aws-amplify/data-schema and let us know if that resolves the issue for you?

[iartemiev]

@rnrnstar2

Although I am updating to the latest version like this, the @aws-amplify/data-schema version does not become 1.3.0. Updating with npm update @aws-amplify/data-schema does not change anything.

The dependency version "@aws-amplify/data-schema": "^1.0.0", under the @aws-amplify/api-graphql and @aws-amplify/backend packages is expected. The ^ caret in front of the version means those packages support any minor version of @aws-amplify/data-schema under major version 1.

If you search your lock file for node_modules/@aws-amplify/data-schema, you'll see the actual version of the package that is getting installed in your project. That should resolve to 1.3.x, for example:

"node_modules/@aws-amplify/data-schema": {
  "version": "1.3.3",
  "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@aws-amplify/data-schema/-/data-schema-1.3.3.tgz",
  "integrity": "sha512-HDeARVzHG9xLvqnl95rp6JNVRieNdd08/lA78wQcx9VPr6mTIQFcgsG/rM6Eu6TGJ5xtifr1X1TFVQ5OKx7Pfg==",
  "dependencies": {
    "@aws-amplify/data-schema-types": "*",
    "@types/aws-lambda": "^8.10.134",
    "rxjs": "^7.8.1"
  }
},

npm update @aws-amplify/data-schema will install the latest version of the package.

[iartemiev]

@javabudd - are you seeing the error on generateClient() as well? Could you share what you're assigning to dateOps in your schema so that we can attempt to reproduce? Lastly, which version of the @aws-amplify/data-schema is installed in your app per the package-lock.json?

[javabudd]

I am seeing the error when using generateClient yes

const dateOps = {
	createdAt: a.datetime().required(),
	deletedAt: a.datetime(),
}

"node_modules/@aws-amplify/data-schema": {
      "version": "1.3.4",
      "resolved": "https://registry.npmjs.org/@aws-amplify/data-schema/-/data-schema-1.3.4.tgz",
      "integrity": "sha512-hzfn9ER8UbdhoE4RGttDxJrnH6EAc7WBGRNa8NyKMVCMSlLUIvf8+XyX5e1zmEPLl48TtwuQvOd+CkhWrBraHg==",
      "license": "Apache-2.0",
      "dependencies": {
        "@aws-amplify/data-schema-types": "*",
        "@types/aws-lambda": "^8.10.134",
        "rxjs": "^7.8.1"
      }
    },

[iartemiev]

@javabudd thanks, I was able to repro. Your issue shares the same root cause as https://github.com/aws-amplify/amplify-category-api/issues/2592 even though you may be getting a different type error on your end. We're currently working on a solution to this, so please follow that issue for updates.

[iartemiev]

Closing, we haven't heard back after providing package upgrade instructions.

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue is now closed. Comments on closed issues are hard for our team to see. If you need more assistance, please open a new issue that references this one.