Alberto Paderno

It is the behavior documented in the code. ```php if (!isset($module_data[$module])) { // This module is not found in the filesystem, abort. return FALSE; } ```

It is documented in the return value description too, excepts the code consider dependencies also all the modules passed in `$module_list` (which is not probably what I would expect). >...

To make it clearer, these are the first lines in [`module_enable()`](https://docs.backdropcms.org/api/backdrop/core%21includes%21module.inc/function/module_enable/1). ```php if ($enable_dependencies) { // Get all module data so we can find dependencies and sort. $module_data = system_rebuild_module_data();...

Isn't [PHP_CodeSniffer](https://github.com/marketplace/actions/php_codesniffer) a different Github action?

That action checks all the files when the `scan_all` option in the workflow file is set to `true`; otherwise, it checks only the changed files. At least, that is what...

Even the currently used action reports `phpcs` errors in places that are not touched from a PR. Probably, it reports less irrelevant errors, but it still does. (I noticed that...

I checked a preview site for an existing PR. After I logged in, and removed the only existing post, I see the following, on the front page.  That is...

For the /node/add page, this is what I see (even when I do not remove the existing post) as anonymous user. >  Looking at the front page as anonymous...

I checked the code currently committed for the page callback used for /node ([`node_page_default()`](https://github.com/backdrop/backdrop/blob/19dc618f14b47c80d5734e781d4fb89f4d9d3fcc/core/modules/node/node.module#L2355)). I do not see any line adding the *Go to the [content type creation page] to...

I thought it was a view showing what reported in the issue summary, but I cannot see any frontpage view in /admin/structure/views, nor could I see anything that explicitly shows...