Shuhei Kadowaki

> @aviatesk Could I ask for your review here? Specifically on [3a6b36c](https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/45062/commits/3a6b36c062c36c3250ee299cf7a3ef6672262782) where I revert some of #44512, as well as on [884e5ea](https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/45062/commits/884e5eaea0443f216b26bfe426b3a4121edca5a5), where I somewhat broadly restrict the cases...

@nanosoldier `runbenchmarks(!"scalar", vs=":master")`

> By bringing back [this branch](https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/45062/commits/b2ea6d114bfe7516bf40bd7e557e0e171c873864#diff-c08d0dffd36a142536203edece93dbe8656a68c607fd06256903d4b2ed8f2942R1284-R1310) that was removed in #44512, we were able to be a bit more fine-grained about when we could bypass validating sparams (as well as...

@nanosoldier `runbenchmarks("inference", vs=":master")`

Congrats, @ianatol !

Yeah, it's only because return type information or the `Locals` information show result that is "squashed" to represent inference on a single frame, while our compiler actually sees types per-statement....

It seems like we can access to both documentations even if we have a separate documentation for `Int`: ```julia julia> @eval begin """ Parent Documentation for `Parent` """ struct Parent...

I think `String` are (always?) copied by reference whatever size it has. Is this understanding correct, @Keno or @vtjnash ?

@nanosoldier `runtests(["ADI", "AMLPipelineBase", "ANOVA", "ARules", "Agents", "AlgebraOfGraphics", "Arrow", "AutoMLPipeline", "BGEN", "BHAtp", "BallroomSkatingSystem", "BangBang", "BedgraphFiles", "BenchmarkConfigSweeps", "Binscatters", "BioFetch", "BipolarSphericalHarmonics", "BoltzmannMachinesPlots", "Bootstrap", "CMAEvolutionStrategy", "CSVReader", "Cassette", "ChainLadder", "CoinbasePro", "CombinatorialSpaces", "ConstraintSolver", "CovarianceMatrices", "CropRootBox", "CrystalInfoFramework",...

The failing test case will be fixed by #44896.