added new package pocache
We want to ensure high quality of the packages. Make sure that you've checked the boxes below before sending a pull request.
- [x] I have read the Contribution Guidelines
- [x] I have read the Maintainers Note
- [x] I have read the Quality Standards
Not every repository (project) will require every option, but most projects should. Check the Contribution Guidelines for details.
- [x] The repo documentation has a pkg.go.dev link.
- [x] The repo documentation has a coverage service link.
- [x] The repo documentation has a goreportcard link.
- [x] The repo has a version-numbered release and a go.mod file.
- [x] The repo has a continuous integration process that automatically runs tests that must pass before new pull requests are merged.
- [x] Continuous integration is used to attempt to catch issues prior to releasing this package to end-users.
Please provide some links to your package to ease the review
- [x] forge link (github.com, gitlab.com, etc): https://github.com/naughtygopher/pocache
- [x] pkg.go.dev: https://pkg.go.dev/github.com/naughtygopher/pocache
- [x] goreportcard.com: https://goreportcard.com/report/github.com/naughtygopher/pocache
- [x] coverage service link (codecov, coveralls, etc.): https://coveralls.io/github/naughtygopher/pocache?branch=main
Pull Request content
- [x] The package has been added to the list in alphabetical order.
- [x] The package has an appropriate description with correct grammar.
- [x] As far as I know, the package has not been listed here before.
Please delete one of the following lines:
- [x] The packages around my addition still meet the Quality Standards.
Thanks for your PR, you're awesome! :sunglasses:
Thank you for contributing to awesome-go. We will review your contribution as soon as possible.
Make sure you add the links in the body of the pull request that are requested in the contribution guide:
- repo link
- pkg.go.dev
- goreportcard.com
- coverage
Your project is under review. It may take a few days to be approved.
Thanks for sharing. It looks like a good project
hey @phanirithvij any help here?
p.s: tagging you since you merged my previous PR 😅
Apologies, we have a new hard rule against accepting < 5 months old projects. I can ask you to re-submit it in 5 months. Or we can keep this pr open and I will label it appropriately.
Since this was requested to be added before this rule change, I can accept it.