tp-libvirt
tp-libvirt copied to clipboard
Backingchain: add new case with different disk attributes
This PR add: VIRT-294609: Do blockcommit/blockpull with different attributes of driver elements Test Result:
# avocado run --vt-type libvirt --test-runner=runner --vt-machine-type q35 backingchain.with_disk_attributes_test.with_driver_attributes
JOB ID : 402dc95b928e79712eccbb1f35a8b2fb0281f299
JOB LOG : /var/lib/avocado/job-results/job-2022-12-08T02.08-402dc95/job.log
(1/8) type_specific.io-github-autotest-libvirt.backingchain.with_disk_attributes_test.with_driver_attributes.blockcommit.with_copy_on_read: PASS (91.04 s)
(2/8) type_specific.io-github-autotest-libvirt.backingchain.with_disk_attributes_test.with_driver_attributes.blockcommit.with_cache_discard: PASS (94.13 s)
(3/8) type_specific.io-github-autotest-libvirt.backingchain.with_disk_attributes_test.with_driver_attributes.blockcommit.with_detect_zeroes: PASS (88.00 s)
(4/8) type_specific.io-github-autotest-libvirt.backingchain.with_disk_attributes_test.with_driver_attributes.blockcommit.with_metadata_cache: PASS (91.25 s)
(5/8) type_specific.io-github-autotest-libvirt.backingchain.with_disk_attributes_test.with_driver_attributes.blockpull.with_copy_on_read: PASS (173.51 s)
(6/8) type_specific.io-github-autotest-libvirt.backingchain.with_disk_attributes_test.with_driver_attributes.blockpull.with_cache_discard: PASS (267.09 s)
(7/8) type_specific.io-github-autotest-libvirt.backingchain.with_disk_attributes_test.with_driver_attributes.blockpull.with_detect_zeroes: PASS (160.54 s)
(8/8) type_specific.io-github-autotest-libvirt.backingchain.with_disk_attributes_test.with_driver_attributes.blockpull.with_metadata_cache: PASS (151.44 s)
RESULTS : PASS 8 | ERROR 0 | FAIL 0 | SKIP 0 | WARN 0 | INTERRUPT 0 | CANCEL 0
JOB HTML : /var/lib/avocado/job-results/job-2022-12-08T02.08-402dc95/results.html
JOB TIME : 1121.47 s
Signed-off-by: Meina Li [email protected]
Depend on https://github.com/avocado-framework/avocado-vt/pull/3573 Label: moddular_redesign
@nanli1 Would you help to review this case again? Thanks.