Upgrade the libraries and make it compatible with Java8
AC: Upgrade the dependant libraries to their latest compatible version with Java8.
This seems like a pre-req or a good excersize before switching to Java17.
Some work already has been done by @baulea .
Hello @baulea , can you please put the ticket/issue details and PR details in the comments for everyone's visibility?
Can I take this up
AC: Upgrade the dependant libraries to their latest compatible version with Java8.
This seems like a pre-req or a good excersize before switching to Java17.
Some work already has been done by @baulea .
Hello @baulea , can you please put the ticket/issue details and PR details in the comments for everyone's visibility?
Yes, I will soon provide the PR, probably on Sunday.
Hi @authorjapps, I created the following pull request: #609
The PR includes the following:
-
consolidate maven plugins:
- Move maven plugin versions and configuration to pluginManagement section in parent.pom.
- Upgrade maven plugin versions
- Fix warnings during maven build regarding missing version for maven-compiler-plugin
-
upgrade dependencies in pom.xml:
- upgrade org.jukito:jukito from 1.4.1 to 1.5
- upgrade commons-io:commons-io:2.4 to 2.15.0
- upgrade com.aventstack:extentreports:4.0.9 to 5.0.9
- upgrade com.google.code.gson:gson:2.6.2 to 2.10.1
- upgrade com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java:3.13.0 to 3.24.4
-
with upgrade com.aventstack:extentreports:4.0.9 to 5.0.9 replace ExtentHtmlReporter with ExtentSparkReporter in ExtentReportsFactory.java
-
change in core/pom.xml:
- set test scope for org.jukito:jukito
- remove unused dependency com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jdk8
- remove direct dependency ch.qos.logback:logback-core, because it is a direct dependency from ch.qos.logback:logback-classic
- add direct dependency org.apache.httpcomponents:httpmime:4.5.12
-
change in kafka-testing/pom.xml:
- remove com.google.protobuf:protobuf-java-util
- remove dependency for com.github.os72:protoc-jar
Hi @authorjapps, is there anything else I should do? Or are we just waiting for a reviewer to review the PR #609 ?
As suggested by @a1shadows in https://github.com/authorjapps/zerocode/pull/609 I'll have a look at some more dependencies and try an upgrade.