Augustine Kim

My suspicion is that swc's decorator config is the standard decorator proposal implementation, not TypeScript's experimental decorator, which might be this https://swc.rs/docs/configuration/compilation#jsctransformlegacydecorator

I don't know about Stencil but we don't require `decoratorMetadata` to be true.

I think this issue is referring to starter kits, which are currently tailored for authoring and publishing a single component. We have wanted for a long time to show case...

Check out https://lit.dev/playground/#sample=examples/context-basics and toggle the language to JS for a running example. We haven't gotten around to adding any switchable code samples for those docs but it shouldn't be...

Thank you for raising this! We definitely should try and make this repo buildable in Windows. In the meantime, I have found WSL2 to be quite good as a dev...

Is it possible this might be due to some extension?

/gcbrun preview URL: https://pr1278-81e742c---lit-dev-5ftespv5na-uc.a.run.app/articles/lit-with-tailwind/

> I don't think we need to wait. It is pretty much settled now on import attributes (with) Agreed. I think it's fine to publish now with the notes and...

Thank you for the report! Transferred issue to the lit.dev repo as this is a documentation issue.

> Instead of using codepen, could we at least have this setup in the lit playground somehow? lit playground already loads all bare specifiers from unpkg with the playground worker...