at_client_sdk
at_client_sdk copied to clipboard
Streaming sync aka fsync
New ticket for continuation of work started in #411
No progress in PR36; moving to PR37
Some progress in PR39 so reduced from 8SP to 5SP
@gkc should we move up to high priority?
No. Holding off until what we have is stable
Will be my primary focus in PR49 to make this available for user testing. We continue to see a drip drip of new sync-related bugs, I don't think it's correct any longer to 'wait until what we have is stable'.
Moved back to Backlog as we are doing a bottom-up and top-down review of the expectations of sync. Once we have those expectations covered by tests and implemented in the current SyncServiceImpl, it will be straightforward to move to a streaming model rather than the current batch model.