ArturTomczak

yes, in RASE terms that would be a Selection. Choosing RegEx flavour that supports negation would enable Selection/Exception use cases without changing the IDS schema.

For a moment, I thought this `(test){0}` would work, but it looks like instead of "there can't be no "test", it works like "no test is fine". How about instead...

There you go, I added ECMA (and JGSoft), resulting in excluding ten more rows (good!): | Category | Feature | .NET | Java | PCRE | Python | JGsoft |...

So, in IDS terms, are you, @NickNisbet, proposing adding IfcRelSpaceBoundary to the list of allowed relations of the PartOf facet? I'm not an architect. What is the practical use of...

Hi @MatthiasWeise, have a look at this PR and especially the property facet configuration and leave your comments: https://github.com/buildingSMART/IDS/blob/665dce400d5650edece7caa98e241dbb2bc97746/Documentation/UserManual/property-facet.md#requirements

That has been merged. Going back to the topic, in the current IDS, it is necessary to specify the datatype because omitting whether a value is an IFCTEXT, IFCLABEL, or...

yes, I agree this is undesired. #344 provides a possible solution.

The documentation looks fine to me as it is. Yes, the requirements are ignored when the subset selected by applicability is prohibited because the existence of prohibited elements already triggers...

As you already noticed, we have only IFC4.3 as of now in the bSDD, hence, we are only referencing that one. My advice is to always use those classes that...

So, can we remove those annotations from IFC4.3.2+?