website
website copied to clipboard
refactor: docker build instruction line (README.md)
Fix #3271
Description
Before
After
- fix the typing mistake in docker build instruction line there is a extra backtick at the end of code
- ...
- ...
Summary by CodeRabbit
- Documentation
- Improved formatting and corrected a syntax error in the Docker build command in the README file.
- Maintained the overall structure and content regarding project setup, requirements, and contribution guidelines.
Walkthrough
The changes in the README.md file consist of a formatting correction in the Docker build command section. An extraneous backtick was removed to fix a syntax error. The document's overall structure, content, and instructions regarding project setup, requirements, and contribution guidelines remain unchanged.
Changes
| File | Change Summary |
|---|---|
| README.md | Corrected syntax error in Docker build command; minor formatting adjustments. |
Sequence Diagram(s)
No sequence diagram is generated as the changes are too simple and do not involve modifications to the control flow.
Assessment against linked issues
| Objective | Addressed | Explanation |
|---|---|---|
| Correct the Docker build command syntax (#3271) | β |
Suggested labels
ready-to-merge
Suggested reviewers
- derberg
- magicmatatjahu
- Mayaleeeee
- asyncapi-bot-eve
- devilkiller-ag
- sambhavgupta0705
- akshatnema
π° "In the README, a change so slight,
A backtick's gone, now everything's right.
With setup and guidelines, clear as can be,
Hop along, dear coder, and build with glee!
Docker awaits, so letβs take flight,
With a click and a build, all will be bright!" π
π Recent review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL
π₯ Commits
Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0cc4490b4e49ce34b5c323f8ec6cd31304e6f076 and c45335db6d46995c257263774f8f18e5b0115377.
π Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(1 hunks)
π§ Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- README.md
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
πͺ§ Tips
Chat
There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
- Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.Generate unit testing code for this file.Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
- Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.@coderabbitai modularize this function.
- PR comments: Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.
CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
@coderabbitai pauseto pause the reviews on a PR.@coderabbitai resumeto resume the paused reviews.@coderabbitai reviewto trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.@coderabbitai full reviewto do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.@coderabbitai summaryto regenerate the summary of the PR.@coderabbitai resolveresolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.@coderabbitai configurationto show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.@coderabbitai helpto get help.
Other keywords and placeholders
- Add
@coderabbitai ignoreanywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add
@coderabbitai summaryto generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add
@coderabbitaianywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.
Documentation and Community
- Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
- Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
- Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
Deploy Preview for asyncapi-website ready!
Built without sensitive environment variables
| Name | Link |
|---|---|
| Latest commit | c45335db6d46995c257263774f8f18e5b0115377 |
| Latest deploy log | https://app.netlify.com/sites/asyncapi-website/deploys/674ad7f7cf54640008e3b921 |
| Deploy Preview | https://deploy-preview-3272--asyncapi-website.netlify.app |
| Preview on mobile | Toggle QR Code...Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link. |
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.
β‘οΈ Lighthouse report for the changes in this PR:
| Category | Score |
|---|---|
| π΄ Performance | 34 |
| π’ Accessibility | 98 |
| π’ Best practices | 92 |
| π’ SEO | 100 |
| π΄ PWA | 33 |
Lighthouse ran on https://deploy-preview-3272--asyncapi-website.netlify.app/
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 67.77%. Comparing base (
eb9a128) to head (c45335d). Report is 1 commits behind head on master.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3272 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 67.77% 67.77%
=======================================
Files 21 21
Lines 664 664
=======================================
Hits 450 450
Misses 214 214
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
/rtm