Enable validation of an example payload

[ThanksForAllTheFish]

It would be cool to enable Studio to validate an example payload against the message schema.

This would enable quick prototyping and move into a direction of one tool to rule them all, as currently it is possible to use third party validator like https://www.jsonschemavalidator.net

[github-actions[bot]]

Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for reporting your first issue. Please check out our contributors guide and the instructions about a basic recommended setup useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.

[magicmatatjahu]

Thanks for the feature proposal! :)

I don’t know, I thought it might help me, but not sure if someone feels the same restrictions since in the there are many json schema validators online (did not think of using those somehow)

Don't worry, it will be needed. Most likely we will do it as a separate panel where you can select a message/channel/scheme and validate the necessary inputs anyway.

[boyney123]

Thanks for the idea @ThanksForAllTheFish , think this is a great idea ➕

[magicmatatjahu]

Action points:

• create new component to render new "view" where we will support mentioned possibility:
  • it should have one textarea section where people will be able to pass the example payload/headers.
  • it should have select section where people will be able to select given payload/headers from existing AsyncAPI doc
  • it should have section where we will show possible errors.
• it should look like https://www.jsonschemavalidator.net/ but without that left input (there should be select section)
• the style should be consistent with the style of the rest of the application
• unit tests are welcome
• please don't focus on the integration (panel switching etc). It's nice to have but not required. We can make integration as followup after writing that new panel.

Before contribution please start discussion to clarify implementation and your questions/problems :)

This problem is involved in the OpenForce event. Please don't contribute if you are not participating in this event. If the problem is not solved at the end of the event, feel free to contribute :)

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity :sleeping:

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience :heart:

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity :sleeping:

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience :heart: