[FEATURE] Support for Google Pub/Sub

[Silthus]

Why do we need this improvement?

It would be great if the generator would also support generating Google Pub/Sub clients.

How will this change help?

It would allow to use the Async API schema with Google Pub/Sub, because without a client generation the hurdle is very high to adopt the schema.

Screenshots

No response

How could it be implemented/designed?

I looked at the source code, but did not really find the point where the provider specific logic is implemented.

🚧 Breaking changes

No

👀 Have you checked for similar open issues?

• [x] I checked and didn't find a similar issue

🏢 Have you read the Contributing Guidelines?

• [x] I have read the Contributing Guidelines

Are you willing to work on this issue?

None

[github-actions[bot]]

Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for reporting your first issue. Please check out our contributors guide and the instructions about a basic recommended setup useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.

[derberg]

@Silthus this template is using a pretty old, although stable framework for handling event-driven with different providers: https://www.npmjs.com/package/hermesjs

It works, but extending it with new protocols support - well, not the best.

I personally do not want to invest much in this template anymore. As core maintainer of AsyncAPI Generator I'm investing my time in new approach in generator, where core community supported templates will be part of generator: https://github.com/asyncapi/generator/tree/master/packages

My main focus is clients, but first is websocket as I have more use cases for it, and also there are many public websocket APIs to play with. This doesn't mean we cannot onboard other clients sooner, just need people willing to help.

So my answer is, yes, Google Pub/Sub 100%, but really not here in my opinion.

Now question is, how much are you interested in it, and what are your deadlines, do you want to join as contributor or maybe your company wants to support development?

Btw, we will have the AsyncAPI conference in Munich in July (APIDays again hosts our community for free) and I plan to be there to MC it. I recommend you subscribe to https://www.asyncapi.com/en/newsletter where we will announce free tickets for our community once we get them.

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity :sleeping:

It will be closed in 120 days if no further activity occurs. To unstale this issue, add a comment with a detailed explanation.

There can be many reasons why some specific issue has no activity. The most probable cause is lack of time, not lack of interest. AsyncAPI Initiative is a Linux Foundation project not owned by a single for-profit company. It is a community-driven initiative ruled under open governance model.

Let us figure out together how to push this issue forward. Connect with us through one of many communication channels we established here.

Thank you for your patience :heart: