[BUG] Different semantic information in output when using request/reply. (HTML vs Markdown)
Describe the bug.
AsyncAPI (3.0.0)
When using this template the output file contains reply information that differs semantically from the output of the html template
Markdown output
Request information
- request should be done to channel: pong
That's somehow confusing, because pong is the channel i want to read the response from. The given message suggest i should send my request to the pong channel, which is wrong.
This happens with send-operations.
receive-operations give this information:
reply should be done to channel: pong
Which makes more sense. (Although the HTML output is still more clear to me)
I want to add that I'm not entirely sure i understood the reply feature correctly. But according to Doc: Adding reply info and when inspecting the html output, i think it makes sense.
Expected behavior
The expected markdown output should match the HTML output in the context of reply information
HTML output:
REPLY CHANNEL INFORMATION Reply will be provided via this designated address: pong
Because it tells me on which channel the response can be read from.
Screenshots
Files: files.zip
markdown-template
html-template
How to Reproduce
- create operation with "action: send" and "reply:.." using AsyncAPI 3.0.0
- generate markdown file with this template
- notice confusing reply-information
🥦 Browser
Mozilla Firefox
👀 Have you checked for similar open issues?
- [X] I checked and didn't find similar issue
🏢 Have you read the Contributing Guidelines?
- [X] I have read the Contributing Guidelines
Are you willing to work on this issue ?
No, someone else can work on it
Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for reporting your first issue. Please check out our contributors guide and the instructions about a basic recommended setup useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.
thanks, makes sense, are you willing to open a PR with the fix?
If no one is working on this issue, may I work on this?
sure thing
:tada: This issue has been resolved in version 1.6.7 :tada:
The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot :package::rocket: