astrand
astrand
From one perspective, why should we change the behaviour and break compatibility for all X11 users, just because some other competing project wants to do things differently? xclip was written...
xclip won't build without a patch similar to the one below: I've been unable to get configure to look in the correct include path... --- configure.ac.old 2009-11-02 22:15:13.000000000 +0200 +++...
- **priority**: 5 --> 7 Original comment by: eitanadler
Hi, please squash the commits together, so that there is a single commit, with a good log message. Also, I'm not convinced of the file name change. Perhaps we can...
I've thought of this a bit more now. Actually, I'm not ready to accept this change for now. I think that reStructuredText would be a more suitable format. For example,...
clear the contents Original comment by: benkibbey
Won't xclip </dev/null do the job here? Original comment by: dallaylaen
Sorry, I haven't read "all clipboards". Original comment by: dallaylaen
The common way of supporting a file name called --something is to treat everything after "--" as file names. See https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Using-Getopt.html . One problem with support both -option and --option...
Original comment by: dallaylaen