PROJECT_ROOT conveted to absolute path in lockfile

[sksat]

Steps to Reproduce

$ cd /tmp
$ rye init hoge --build-system pdm
$ rye init fuga
$ rye add --path ../fuga fuga
Added fuga @ file:///${PROJECT_ROOT}/../fuga as regular dependency
$ rye lock
$ cat requirements.lock | grep fuga

Expected Result

../fuga

Actual Result

fuga @ file:///tmp/hoge/../fuga

Version Info

rye 0.13.0
commit: 0.13.0 (8e011231e 2023-08-29)
platform: linux (x86_64)
self-python: [email protected]
symlink support: true

Stacktrace

No response

[CharlesChen0823]

I think the behavior of current is same as pdm

[carderne]

The solution is to set up a workspace, then all local dependencies will be added to requirements.lock as simply -e file:package_name.

But then you still can't install the path package (fuga in your case) in the dependent package (hoge), as rye/pip-tools will hit a conflict resolving the plain file:package_name and the file:///tmp... that you have.

What I've done is installed the path package as an optional dependency rye add --optional local --path ../fuga fuga, which does nothing to requirements.lock, and then using something like this in my Dockerfiles:

COPY hoge/pyproject.toml requirements.lock ./
RUN sed -i '/^-e file:/d' requirements.lock
RUN pip install '.[local]' --constraint requirements.lock

[np-kyokyo]

Seriously, this. Otherwise, it can't be shared.

[mitsuhiko]

Unfortunately the choices here are limited because the lock file "standard" is relatively restricted. Rye already prefers relative paths in lock files where possible.

[np-kyokyo]

Thank. I wanted to install the openapi_client generated by openapi positioned in a subdirectory as a package. This issue seem to be resolved by properly setting the packageName option in the openapi generator (e.g., --additional-properties=packageName=src.openapi.generated.openapi_client). I will write more if there is anything else.

[roy-ht]

I got some results with uv.

In requirements.lock file, wrote local path dependency like xxx @ file:///abc/def is related to your build backend.

here is used pyproject.toml:

[project]
name = "temp"
version = "0.1.0"
description = "Add your description here"
authors = [
    { name = "Hiroyuki Tanaka", email = "[email protected]" }
]
dependencies = [
    "core @ file:///${PROJECT_ROOT}/../core",
]
readme = "README.md"
requires-python = ">= 3.8"
classifiers = ["Private :: Do Not Upload"]

[build-system]
requires = ["setuptools"]
build-backend = "setuptools.build_meta"

# [build-system]
# requires = ["pdm-backend"]
# build-backend = "pdm.backend"

# [build-system]
# requires = ["hatchling"]
# build-backend = "hatchling.build"

[tool.rye]
managed = true
dev-dependencies = []

[tool.hatch.metadata]
allow-direct-references = true

[tool.hatch.build.targets.wheel]
packages = ["src/temp"]

I checked the generated lock file of three backends and got a result:

hatch: failed to build: "ValueError: Unknown context field PROJECT_ROOT" pdm: absolute path in lockfile setuptools: "file:///${PROJECT_ROOT}/../core" in lockfile

here is a lock file generated by using setuptools backend:

# generated by rye
# use `rye lock` or `rye sync` to update this lockfile
#
# last locked with the following flags:
#   pre: false
#   features: []
#   all-features: false
#   with-sources: false

-e file:.
core @ file:///${PROJECT_ROOT}/../core
    # via temp
wheel==0.42.0
    # via core

My guess

uv seems to use local path info in wheels Requires-Dist section of .dist-info/METADATA file. if I built wheel using pdm, Requires-Dict section is absolute path, and wheel using setuptools is "core@ file:///${PROJECT_ROOT}/../core".

Possible solution

If uv could convert the path to the relative, like "file:///${PROJECT_ROOT}" in its post-process if dependencies in pyproject.toml has "file:///${PROJECT_ROOT}" like path.