Add support for `vulture`-like dead code detection

[charliermarsh]

As a maintainer of a large Python codebase, I found vulture to be really useful, especially for detecting unused functions and unused modules.

This would require us to introduce some new patterns and capabilities that don't yet exist in Ruff, but should! For example, we need to be able to run some analysis over every file (list the used members), then reconcile that analysis post-hoc. We also need to be able to map from references to local modules.

[olliemath]

By the way there is a subset of vulture (and pylint) that would be useful even without mapping out the entire codebase, namely this sort of dead-code detection:

def oops():
    return 1
    return 2  # <- guaranteed never to run

[charliermarsh]

Yeah I'm interested in doing this. @MichaReiser shared some links with me around building these kinds of control-flow graphs. I may write it up as a more detailed issue.

[saippuakauppias]

+1 we really miss this kind of linter in ruff

The most interesting thing is to find those functions and classes that are forgotten and do not run

[eronning]

Also +1 on linting these issues in ruff.

[akx]

+1 – would be nice.

Being 100% certain about deadness of names (even locals) can be tricky – e.g. PyCharm generally highlights (well, lowlights) unused locals, unless it notices vars(), locals(), etc. being used in the same scope, in which case it just throws its paws up and doesn't do that highlighting anymore.

For globals, it gets even harder because a tricky user could be getattring (or vars().geting) from any given module.

[FilipeBento]

This would be extremely useful. I understand full implementation requires a lot of work, but checking if methods or variables are unused is very helpful.

[choweth]

This vulture-like tool is great: https://github.com/asottile/dead

[ofek]

Since this was opened a while ago, have there been any changes internally that would make such an implementation easier?

[dhruvmanila]

Since this was opened a while ago, have there been any changes internally that would make such an implementation easier?

Not yet. Adding multi-file analysis is a feature that's on our roadmap which will allow us to support this.