Arnaud Spiwack

Hi @oliverbunting, I'm so sorry, I don't know how I missed this PR :confused: . Can you comment a little on how you came up with this particular choice of...

Thanks! I've had time, today, to think about this some. Here are my current thoughts: --- Let me start by an aside. I recently wrote a paper regarding using _linear...

Hello again, Sorry I'm taking so much time to answer. It's been busy times, I'm afraid. > I'll confess most of that went by me - both undergrad and research...

Well, we're talking code formatting, of course. With the obvious dose of subjectivity that it entails. But what got me to make this suggestion was that the comment is in-betweeen...

I didn't realise @neongreen 's suggestion was possible, to be honest. It's just as fine with me.

Thanks @sjakobi for the revision. #86 probably fixes this for `docrecords`. But there are issues with the build system, the current repository is not really representative of what Porcupine currently...

I must confess that I don't see precisely what you have in mind. I confess to not having given much thought to what my ideal Prometheus library would look like....

Sorry, I've been a little unreachable in the past few weeks. This is a good question, actually. My general rule of thumb is that it is safe to use `Unsafe.toLinear`...

@endgame > Basically, do we want `Handle`-specific versions of `unsafeAcquire` and `unsafeRelease`? The `Handle`-specific version of `unsafeRelease` is `hClose`. I haven't thought of something for `unsafeAcquire`. Maybe we should?

No, I probably just didn't pay attention. I'm ok to change it. But it's a breaking change, so it needs to be advertised.