Ashok Pon Kumar

@mislav Is there a plan to fix this issue? We are running into this issue as part of our release automation effort too (https://github.com/konveyor/move2kube/blob/3edb173611cb806351770003b8ad17eed13aa207/.github/workflows/release.yml#L257).

> We have this feature implemented by @venkatbandarupalli, can we close this? @ashokponkumar > > https://github.com/konveyor/move2kube/pulls?q=is%3Apr+author%3Avenkatbandarupalli+remote+ sure. Thanks @kmehant @venkatbandarupalli .

**Implemented solution:** Similar to how we have an ordering requirement for known resources in the InstallOrder, users want the capability to order custom resources too. For example a custom resource...

> @ashokponkumar It might be worth setting this to draft until you iron/flesh out the solution more? sure. Done.

> Checking in here to see what’s the status on this. This was opened up in July, and it looks like there is some interest from other community members for...

@hickeyma I am not sure of the difference between a kubernetes resource and an Openshift object. Isn't everything a Kubernetes resource, even if it is added as a CRD. Each...

hooks don't solve this issue for couple of reasons: 1. Conceptually, hooks are things that need to be done outside the chart context. SCC's and many other CRs are part...

Thanks @mattfarina. I completely agree with you. Just for my own understanding, I had been trying to understand the Kubernetes flavors, and it would really help me, if you can...

> The best way would be for Kubernetes to hold an ordering but the Kubernetes project considers things to be declarative so that order should not matter. I would not...

> @ashokponkumar Would it be possible to use a separate chart for the SCC and deploy it prior to the app chart? Technically yes, but it is not ideal for...