Ashwin Maroli
Ashwin Maroli
[Bug]: jekyll 3.10.0 | Error: failed to allocate memory: /:(\+1|\-1|100|1234|1st_place_medal . . . .
@meechiekitten This could be a bug in the `logger` shipped by default with Ruby. Try adding `gem 'logger'` to your Gemfile: ```ruby # Gemfile gem "logger", "~> 1.6" ``` But...
Hello @axelfontaine. This was previously reported via #7682 and seemingly resolved via #8771 in v4.3.0 but had to be reverted via #9170 to restore backwards-compatibility (break reported via #9165). I...
[Bug]: jekyll 3.10.0 | Error: failed to allocate memory: /:(\+1|\-1|100|1234|1st_place_medal . . . .
> I dont understand why the command `bundle exec jekyll serve` works in one directory but not in another one on the same laptop! Could be due to differences in...
[Bug]: jekyll 3.10.0 | Error: failed to allocate memory: /:(\+1|\-1|100|1234|1st_place_medal . . . .
Hello @deadlydog, thank you for reporting this issue and having the source files in a public repository. I was able to reproduce the exact same error at my end (on...
[Bug]: jekyll 3.10.0 | Error: failed to allocate memory: /:(\+1|\-1|100|1234|1st_place_medal . . . .
Hello again, @deadlydog. The following summary shows the result of running GitHub Actions workflows with various parameters. (Reference: https://github.com/ashmaroli/deadlydog.github.io/actions/runs/13814744529) Jekyll Version | Ruby Version | Platform | Result -------------- |...
Greetings @mslinn! :) Though we are aware of inconsistencies across various Jekyll-primitive-types, we can only alter existing behavior in Jekyll 5.0. However, I am open to shipping the `url` attribute...
Hello @InAnYan, While I understand the *unexpectedness* behind being served a page on *How to use Jekyll* when you expected an actual *How Jekyll works*, I don't think there was...
Thank you for submitting a detailed feature request ticket, @Lahoussine-Bouhmou. Pull requests complete with tests and documentation are welcome. Since, this functionality may have significant effect on build times, the...
Hello @a234asthana, thank you for proposing improvements to the docs. However based on the current state of the head-branch, the changes appear to be inconsistent and therefore incomplete:  ###...
P.S. You **need not rebase** your branch after you commit your changes.