Ashley Sommer

Okay, I'm happy to merge this now

This is released now in PySHACL v0.26.0

This is actually something that I've been thinking about for a while. The debug output of PySHACL is confusing, often not helpful, and leads to issues such as: https://github.com/RDFLib/pySHACL/issues/179 I'm...

@ajnelson-nist New PySHACL version v0.22.1 is release that contains the first pass of the new debug output. It is much more verbose now, it emits durations of Shape evaluation, duration...

Hi @volkerjaenisch Thanks for your report. It is stipulated in the SHACL specification that all ontological relationships required for the successful validation of a datagraph against a Shape, must exist...

To answer your original question in this thread: "Shape pointed to by sh:node does not exist or is not a well-formed SHACL NodeShape" You are correct, that is not a...

Leaving this open to remind me to implement this.

I know this is old, but I'll respond here with what the issue is. GraphDB has two different SPARQL endpoints. One for queries, one for updates. The one you're using...

@ahopkins @Tronic Its been a while since I've played with the Sanic codebase, but this bug caught my interest. From what I can see, the issue is relatively straightforward. Before...

Looking further at the implementation of `transport.close()` in UVLoop https://github.com/MagicStack/uvloop/blob/6c770dc3fbdd281d15c2ad46588c139696f9269c/uvloop/handles/basetransport.pyx#L252-L262 I think I see another contributor to this issue. Notice, `transport.close()` closes the _read_ stream, but if there is still...