graphlient icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
graphlient copied to clipboard

Ruby GraphQL Client

Results 22 graphlient issues
Sort by recently updated
recently updated
newest added

**Describe the bug** Graphlient::Errors::TimeoutError does not inherit from Graphlient::Errors::ServerError currently, hence `inner_exception`, `status_code` and `response` can't be called. **To Reproduce** N/A **Expected behavior** As per description, Graphlient::Errors::TimeoutError should inherit from...

good first issue

This PR allows send files via graphql. It adds `FaradayMultipartAdapter` to allow send multipart requests via graphlient gem. It accepts `File` instances and convert its to `Faraday::UploadIO` before sending.

![screen shot 2017-10-19 at 2 01 04 pm](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/542335/31786291-fc70cd24-b4d5-11e7-842a-f979919ddef8.png) We allow parsing of queries into static versions (see https://github.com/ashkan18/graphlient/pull/25/commits/31e145bedc8087861e9ba0b97af95b09f46e390d), but we aren't deprecating dynamic queries which are much easier to use....

enhancement

Followup from #7 and #29. Currently we require Faraday and default to `Graphlient::Adapters::HTTP::FaradayAdapter`. We could default to `Graphlient::Adapters::HTTP::HTTPAdapter` and remove Faraday as a required dependency, but we lose the nice...

enhancement

Hi, Just wondering if [union types](https://graphql.org/learn/schema/#union-types) are supported via the block syntax somehow. Ie. some way to generate the `... on SomeType` syntax.

Hey! Thanks for making a gem. I don't have a schema for my endpoint, but I do have a query + params. Is there a way to query without a...

question

http://graphql.org/learn/queries/#aliases

enhancement

See https://github.com/slack-ruby/slack-ruby-client/pull/322.

enhancement

When updating from `graphlient` v0.3.3 to v0.3.7, I'm seeing an odd error: ``` Graphlient::Errors::ClientError: Field 'image_raw' doesn't exist on type 'Resource' ``` Here's a rough cut of the code resulting...

bug
question