nullday

Assign it to me. I would give a plan first and any suggestions?

> Hi, is there some progress? I am still working on part rescontruct from those lines: ``` root = llb.User("envd")(root) // Refer to https://github.com/moby/buildkit/blob/31054718bf775bf32d1376fe1f3611985f837584/frontend/dockerfile/dockerfile2llb/convert_runmount.go#L46 cache := root.File(llb.Mkdir("/cache", 0755, llb.WithParents(true), llb.WithUIDGID(g.uid,...

I would decide the final solutions method this weekend: - Continue to convert the llb.state to Dockerfile - Constrcut the a structure as the interfaces of `llb.state` but in fact...

Should we have a proposal first?

> Maybe we should schedule a meeting for this?

> @aseaday I think #91 is the high priority now. `load` syntax is somehow builtin functionality of starlark to load function from other file. There're some default behaviors we can...

IMHO it is very important keyword and design. Even I don't have specfic ideas about how to load a llb function which other contributers write for a third-party packages like...

As for this and https://github.com/tensorchord/envd/issues/581: Maybe we should use a self custome python installer for those image may do not have apt or package manager? @gaocegege WDYT

I think we could do a exporter. But we need to have a good design. Because I think we should reduce the difficulty for users to ananlyze the data but...

Let me state it clearly. For the first quesion, I think we should better also provide a simple all-in-one index such as a user's computing device is busy or free....