Rename image in Docker Hub to asciidoctor/asciidoctor

[mojavelinux]

Currently, the image in the Docker register is asciidoctor/docker-asciidoctor. This name is not consistent with how other Docker images are named. Since this is the official Docker image for Asciidoctor, the name should be asciidoctor/asciidoctor. Let's change it.

We might even want to see if we can become an official image, so we get the name "asciidoctor" all by itself (like ruby). But that might be a next step after resolving the topic at hand.

[dduportal]

👍 I'm on it.

About the "official" image, the process on Docker side is quite tedious:

• No build-args
• No Multi stage builds

keep in mind that we might keep both asciidoctor/asciidoctor and ascidoctor images

(I'm thinking about the jenkins image which moved to jenkins/jenkins or the amount of work required for us at Containous for the traefik official image...)

[mojavelinux]

Thanks for the insight @dduportal! If it would restrict us too much, then I say we don't want to pursue the official image...at least not now. We could also consider a simpler image for that purpose, as you suggested, if we really want to hold that spot.

[egorse]

How about to have properly tagged images there too ? ;)

[mojavelinux]

Could you file a separate issue for that?

[tbreuss]

I stumpled upon this issue while looking for the official asciidoctor image on docker registry.

Is there any progress on this? The issue is exactly one year old.

[mojavelinux]

This is rolled up into #54.

[dduportal]

For clarity, the issue #54 will be solved only on the current name. As soon as the release process will be ok, a new task for renaming the Docker repos and building 2 images (asciidoctor/asciidoctor and asciidoctor/box) will be done then.