Aidan Salzmann

I think it's important to consider: what process is useful? IMO the goal should not be to move everything from UNSPECIFIED/UNENFORCED -> ENFORCED SOCIALLY -> ENFORCED BY CODE. **Rather, we...

Yes, it's used implicitly. For example, here https://github.com/Stride-Labs/stride/blob/0dbbbd867ffad5b331d09c155dca53a3f581ad5c/x/stakeibc/keeper/unbonding_records.go#L295 If we didn't have another state, we wouldn't know which records to process. It's also useful for monitoring. Removing that comment here...

We're working on a fix for this! Here's the PR, it'll be out in our next upgrade https://github.com/Stride-Labs/stride/pull/286

From Jae: > oh sorry I thought you said phATOM. stATOM should get the airdrop but depending on how the delegated validators voted. https://twitter.com/jaekwon/status/1729275809675034737 This approach seems reasonable to me

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bAmtRnBISgx8i5lJwJH6Kh-a9885N2_1LTNp5mCU1u8/edit#gid=0 | Vote | Stride Weighted | |---------|-----------------| | YES | 0.55875 | | NO | 0.2725 | | ABSTAIN | 0.14 | | WEIGHTED| 0.02875 | This is extremely...

> I think stATOM holders should not have governance representation directly, hence should not be recipient of the airdrop as other ATOM stakers. Can you elaborate on this? I don't...

Thanks for linking that rationale, that's helpful. > They don't even pick their validators so how using their validators vote would be an indicator of their alignment is a bit...

> what about statom on evmos? I updated the issue to include Evmos, thanks for pointing that out.

That's possible - I need to do some research on PHOTON to better understand whether it both gives users choice and has fair slashing (I'm not sure). Bringing this back...

@giunatale @jaekwon now that there's a launch date planned, I figured it'd make sense to revisit this. In my view, stATOM holders should still get an airdrop, even if it's...